!9IQChSjwSHXPPWTa:lix.systems

Lix

1101 Members
Lix user channel. Feel free to discuss on-topic issues here and give each other help. For matrix.to links to the rest of the Lix channels, see: https://wiki.lix.systems/books/lix-organisation/page/matrix-rooms293 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
5 Dec 2025
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius
In reply to @helle:tacobelllabs.net
we should just store it in xattrs (I am extremely joking)
We did try it alas in a non joking fashion, won't work reliably
13:31:02
@helle:tacobelllabs.nethelle (just a stray cat girl)yeah, we know, this is why we jokingly brought it back up13:31:31
@thubrecht:matrix.orgthubrecht Or just write a custom fs to use for the nix store 13:32:50
@helle:tacobelllabs.nethelle (just a stray cat girl).... it had crossed my mind before at least.....13:34:17
@helle:tacobelllabs.nethelle (just a stray cat girl)oh, who is responsible for lixcon pretix setup, the account name that pretix includes for bank orders apparently does not match the actual account name (and it is always funny that there are banks in Europe that check this) the claimed account name by pretix is "DELEGATION GENERALE NUMERIQUE" but the actual account name is "DELEGATION GENERALE NUMERIQUE - DGNUM" and some banks will trip on this13:44:37
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusi am13:49:13
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusi will fix that13:49:22
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusonce the accelerated FUSE stuff is out13:49:35
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusfixed13:52:13
@rosssmyth:matrix.orgrosssmythaccelerated FUSE? Like FUSE pass-through? 15:36:02
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusye15:36:06
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusthe recent FUSE passthrough that Darrick Wong sent15:36:14
@aloisw:julia0815.dealoisw
In reply to @raitobezarius:matrix.org
Are you Christian? We need christians to contribute to SQLite
Sorry, I fear I don't understand. Wal2 already exists in a separate branch but the author's user name is "dan", not something that would refer to Christian. Also SQLite does not accept external contributions at all I think?
15:47:37
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa https://sqlite.org/codeofethics.html 15:50:16
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa* I think this refers to various rules here https://sqlite.org/codeofethics.html15:50:34
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa

Prefer nothing more than the love of Christ.

15:50:41
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusi didn't know wal2 existed, funny15:51:16
@aloisw:julia0815.dealoisw
In reply to @hexa:lossy.network
I think this refers to various rules here https://sqlite.org/codeofethics.html
what
16:00:24
@aloisw:julia0815.dealoiswSo I guess it's referring to the religion and not the name? While I am in fact Christian in that sense, I do get weird vibes from that document (particularly their introduction), and in any case they do not accept external contributions to begin with.16:02:16
@adam:matrix.system72.devadam changed their profile picture.16:26:10
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusyeah this was the joke here16:38:28
@just1602:systemli.orgjust1602But did some of the fork of sqlite like libsql or turso could fix the issue we face with sqlite?16:40:42
@adam:matrix.system72.devadam changed their profile picture.16:43:41
@hive:the-apothecary.club👉@crystallinefire:chat.solarpunk.moe changed their display name from EVA-01 to 👉@crystallinefire:chat.solarpunk.moe.17:17:17
@aloisw:julia0815.dealoisw I would rather trust SQLite than a VC-backed fork plastering "AI" over their website to stay around. 17:52:46
@aloisw:julia0815.dealoisw And I think it's helpful to figure out what our actual issues with SQLite are. "The WAL grows too large" is a <10 line fix, but of course I don't know yet if this is the only problem. 17:54:24
@aloisw:julia0815.dealoiswUpdate: RESTART checkpoints with 40000 pages tank the speed even more, since checkpoints happen very often due to nix-eval-jobs growing the WAL so fast.18:36:17
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariushah18:47:21
@aloisw:julia0815.dealoiswYeah the WAL just grows so much faster than the database, even with large WAL sizes checkpointing takes quite long.19:01:35
@aloisw:julia0815.dealoiswPage size of 512, WAL size of 1 GiB (lower should also work, only increasing the fsync cost) and RESTART checkpointing looks quite nice with the synthetic test case. There are still stalls, but they are like 7 seconds after 2 minutes.19:30:36

There are no newer messages yet.


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 10