| 14 May 2024 |
 samrose | raitobezarius: does it help to use the content addressed approach to derivations for what you are thinking? | 15:39:58 |
 raitobezarius | Not really, you need to attach in the store the result of walking the useful build dependencies of a Nix drv closure I think? | 15:41:56 |
| raitobezarius | It's orthogonal to CA mostly | 15:42:03 |
| samrose | In reply to @raitobezarius:matrix.org
Not really, you need to attach in the store the result of walking the useful build dependencies of a Nix drv closure I think? Useful means "what has changed" is that right, so that you can somehow skip what has not changed? | 15:44:28 |
| raitobezarius | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/180529 | 15:45:55 |
| samrose | In reply to @raitobezarius:matrix.org
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/180529 Hmm yeah cool that seems to be where the ball was picked up and carried forward https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/180529#issuecomment-1772248566 and I will take the time to read this sometime soon LOL https://discourse.nixos.org/t/pre-rfc-implement-dependency-retrieval-primitive/43418/6 | 15:58:39 |
|  kha13d joined the room. | 16:01:53 |
 toastal-matrix-sucks | How to deal with attribute 'nix_2_19' missing for haskellModules? | 16:07:07 |
| toastal-matrix-sucks | Is there a different overlay? Will there be missing features that break this? | 16:07:48 |
| toastal-matrix-sucks | * How to deal with attribute 'nix_2_19' missing for haskell-modules? | 16:08:27 |
 Qyriad | that'sā¦ odd, we shouldn't be touching 2.19? | 16:51:43 |
 @tc424:glasgow.social | warning: AWS error uploading 'nix-cache-info': Forbidden: Operation is not allowed for this key. am I going to regret wondering why nix-shell is trying to upload to a substituter? | 17:23:15 |
 K900 | Yes | 17:24:00 |
| K900 | But it is also too late now | 17:24:03 |
| @tc424:glasgow.social | Oh, for some reason nix-cache-info has gone awol | 17:24:19 |
| @tc424:glasgow.social | but still | 17:24:25 |
| @tc424:glasgow.social | Anyway, proves I've got my permissions correct, at least :) | 17:25:00 |
| toastal-matrix-sucks | In reply to @qyriad:katesiria.org
that'sā¦ odd, we shouldn't be touching 2.19? stack trace was from /nix/store/0b11p5g24mgl5qfg34khvjs3fh91vdx4-source/modules/programs/man.nix | 17:37:49 |
| toastal-matrix-sucks | In reply to @qyriad:katesiria.org
that'sā¦ odd, we shouldn't be touching 2.19? * stack trace was from /nix/store/0b11p5g24mgl5qfg34khvjs3fh91vdx4-source/modules/programs/man.nix + ``home-manager.users.toastal.home.file.".manpath".text'` | 17:38:16 |
| toastal-matrix-sucks | * stack trace was from /nix/store/0b11p5g24mgl5qfg34khvjs3fh91vdx4-source/modules/programs/man.nix + home-manager.users.toastal.home.file.".manpath".text' | 17:38:28 |
 @jade_:matrix.org | In reply to @toastal:mozilla.org
stack trace was from /nix/store/0b11p5g24mgl5qfg34khvjs3fh91vdx4-source/modules/programs/man.nix + home-manager.users.toastal.home.file.".manpath".text' thats home-manager | 18:09:20 |
| @jade_:matrix.org | (i am not. fwiw. surprised that home-manager is doing foolish things in re nix stability, since nixpkgs certainly Has Opinions) | 18:09:51 |
|  unlobito joined the room. | 18:24:14 |
 delroth | no reactions allowed on the announcements channel, so instead: congrats on the manual launch :-) | 20:37:29 |
 mjm | i also found myself wanting to react š | 20:37:53 |
| @jade_:matrix.org | oh, busted | 20:38:50 |
| Qyriad | š a manual? it's more likely than you think. https://docs.lix.systems/manual/nightly
Damn, now we actually have the documentation just begging to be rewritten right there, at all times =P | 20:39:25 |
| @jade_:matrix.org | In reply to @delroth:delroth.net
no reactions allowed on the announcements channel, so instead: congrats on the manual launch :-) i fixed it | 20:40:44 |
| delroth | and I did my part now :P | 20:40:53 |
| Qyriad | Thank you for your service ^_^ | 20:41:17 |
