!9IQChSjwSHXPPWTa:lix.systems

Lix

1121 Members
Lix user channel. Feel free to discuss on-topic issues here and give each other help. For matrix.to links to the rest of the Lix channels, see: https://wiki.lix.systems/books/lix-organisation/page/matrix-rooms302 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
9 Jan 2026
@donn:fossi-chat.orgdonn* is nixpkgs-review for packages with a lot of dependents? genuinely asking i may have a mistaken impression about it13:02:10
@k900:0upti.meK900nixpkgs-review is for testing everything that depends on the package still builds13:02:37
@donn:fossi-chat.orgdonngotcha13:02:45
@k900:0upti.meK900It makes no sense when you're adding a leaf package13:02:50
@k900:0upti.meK900Except the comments look pretty and some people have github actions set up to spam that shit on their PRs13:03:01
@k900:0upti.meK900Which is bad, by the way13:03:05
@donn:fossi-chat.orgdonnoh. darwin wasn't even in the supported systems. that would do it13:07:46
@sternenseemann:systemli.orgsterni Is there prior discussion on making the default Nix version for Nixpkgs configurable I can read up on? This is obviously a long standing problem since you always wind up with multiple Nix versions if you don't stick to pkgs.nix even if it's not strictly necessary (due to use of the API etc.) and more urgent with Lix existing now… 17:44:16
@k900:0upti.meK900This was never a thing I believe17:45:38
@k900:0upti.meK900Well technically that's why nixForLinking was introduced17:45:47
@k900:0upti.meK900But eventually we'll probably see things targeting the Lix APIs instead17:46:12
@k900:0upti.meK900 Which means there will have to be a lixForLinking I guess? 17:46:24
@k900:0upti.meK900 But like fundamentally you can't just overlay { nix = final.lix } and have that work 17:46:38
@k900:0upti.meK900Because the APIs have diverged enough17:46:43
@sternenseemann:systemli.orgsterniwhat I was thinking about to begin with was the low hanging fruits, i.e. just stable-ish CLI use. E.g. if you have pkgs.nix in your wrapper for prefetch scripts etc.17:49:15
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusfor flags, we are not planning to break existing CLI flags (except if completely buggy / no usage / etc.) in existing CLIs17:49:44
@sternenseemann:systemli.orgsterniWe kind of need a config option for a mostly compatible use of Nix precisely because you can't overlay pkgs.nix properly anymore.17:49:49
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariuswe would do nix4 for the new CLI17:49:49
@k900:0upti.meK900IMO CLIs should really just use the ambient nix cli17:49:48
@k900:0upti.meK900* IMO CLIs should really just use the ambient nix CLI17:49:50
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusfor outputs in CLI, we would introduce flags for versioning the outputs17:49:59
@sternenseemann:systemli.orgsterniYes, this seems to be the best option at the moment.17:50:11
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusbut then they absolutely need versioned output flag they can rely on17:50:35
@k900:0upti.meK900Well yes17:50:40
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius ex: https://git.lix.systems/lix-project/lix/issues/901 17:50:42
@k900:0upti.meK900Ideally we'd have that17:50:51
@k900:0upti.meK900But overlaying will give you the same problem except worse17:50:59
@neolampis:anarchist.nexusνεολαμπής [NSAolampis] changed their profile picture.18:19:24
@neolampis:anarchist.nexusνεολαμπής [NSAolampis] changed their profile picture.18:21:50
@guiniol:matrix.orgguiniol
In reply to @guiniol:matrix.org
I seem to have borked my system enough that systemd isn't responding via DBUS or something and can't nixos-rebuild switch anymore. So my plan is to boot of a live USB and use nixos-enter to get back into the system with a working systemd. Is there an option to nixos-rebuild switch that will let it rebuild from scratch? Ie, I am fine using the remote cache but I want it to overwrite all the local files that it would normally re-use. Is there an option for that? I don't see it in the man page.
Just another quick update on this: what borked my system was enabling RocM (AMD's competitor to CUDA) on an older APU. They're not supported anymore but they still kinda work. Until the system gets soft locked, and you need to hard reset while you're doing a nixos-rebuild switch, pegging the CPU at 100% for long enough that the SSD heats up and gives you a smart alert about it. So you spend time running so the tests you can think of on the SSD since it was still unstable after the full system rebuild. So, now, RocM is only enabled for btop to get the usage and temperature, via an overlay. And the system is stable, and cool. So, don't be like me and don't enable RocM on an unsupported chip globally. I wanted it for btop but immich also started using it and that's where it went wrong.
19:24:18

There are no newer messages yet.


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 10