| 19 Dec 2025 |
 0x4fbb09 it/its ⛯✇ΘΔ | has anyone ran into problems with forcing agenix to use lix? the module doesn't seem to do that, but https://github.com/xerz-one/agelix/ seems to work. any known risks? | 12:09:54 |
| 0x4fbb09 it/its ⛯✇ΘΔ | (looking at completely removing cppnix from my system, and agenix and nixos-option are the 2 things that still use it.. i never use nixos-option so i could just disable that ig) | 12:11:43 |
 kdn | any idea why would Lix build fail on my Mac Mini M2? got this (and 2 more similar) test errors on 2.94.0:
lix> 58/139 lix:installcheck / functional-nix-shell-basic FAIL 2.18s exit status 1
lix> >>> MSAN_OPTIONS=halt_on_error=1:abort_on_error=1:print_summary=1:print_stacktrace=1 MESON_BUILD_ROOT=/nix/var/nix/builds/nix-build-lix-2.94.0.drv-0/b/source/build MESON_TEST_ITERATION=1 MALLOC_PERTURB_=65 ASAN_OPTIONS=halt_on_error=1:abort_on_error=1:print_summary=1 UBSAN_OPTIONS=halt_on_error=1:abort_on_error=1:print_summary=1:print_stacktrace=1 /nix/store/rzzp5i5sam79i06424dz6h2b5va8gzih-python3-3.13.9-env/bin/python3 /nix/var/nix/builds/nix-build-lix-2.94.0.drv-0/b/source/meson/run-test.py nix-shell/basic.sh
| 15:30:07 |
| kdn | same on 2.93.3 | 15:37:10 |
| kdn | * same on 2.93.3, funnily enough this is just a rebuild of the 2.93.3 after nixpkgs update | 15:37:56 |
 whispers (it/fae) | i haven't needed any workarounds, mine just Does That by default (and has had no issues)
~> nix-store --query --references /nix/store/2a4yaid7m4p4fn9yqj21rhxxdadq6ykr-agenix-0.15.0
/nix/store/20axvl7mgj15m23jgmnq97hx37fgz7bk-diffutils-3.12
/nix/store/fj3ksk20i032wns1w5rz1y76601p1dgr-mktemp-1.7
/nix/store/qvbwz06cqra3cmlra40v0adw75j6j7wm-jq-1.8.1-bin
/nix/store/rlq03x4cwf8zn73hxaxnx0zn5q9kifls-bash-5.3p3
/nix/store/sqr10wh3hb1wbsqmbjjv3mzv7hkz0qwj-lix-2.95.0pre-32d7c02b
/nix/store/vzjkjvfy1y6g7jjqfxnma6mkvf1qsn51-age-1.2.1
| 16:50:44 |
| whispers (it/fae) | though notably i don't use the flake, i just manually import overlay.nix and module.nix from npins | 16:51:44 |
| whispers (it/fae) | * though notably i don't use the flake, i just manually import overlay.nix and module.nix from npins. no clue if that changes anything | 16:52:05 |
| whispers (it/fae) | * though notably i don't use the flake, i just manually import overlay.nix and modules/age.nix from npins. no clue if that changes anything | 16:52:39 |
 Coca | A confusion a friend of mine just had with lix versions, https://docs.lix.systems/manual/lix/stable/ is for the latest version on nixpkgs but in the url it makes it out to be stable. Could it maybe be clarified that it's the latest stable one or something like that? | 18:25:04 |
 K900 | There is no separate "Lix stable" in nixpkgs, is there? | 18:26:18 |
| whispers (it/fae) | there is, but it's only every different from latest on a release channel | 18:27:32 |
| Coca | lixPackageSets.stable vs lixPackageSets.latest, I guess this might be more of a nixpkgs issue then with the naming(?) | 18:28:03 |
| whispers (it/fae) | aiui latest and stable are updated in lockstep on master, but if a new non-patch version of lix comes out, the currently active release branches will only have latest be updated, not stable | 18:28:57 |
| K900 | Huh OK that's a stable nixpkgs thing then | 18:29:11 |
| K900 | I'm too much of an unstable user I guess | 18:29:16 |
| Coca | 
Download image.png | 18:30:12 |
| Coca | I'm on unstable as well | 18:30:18 |
| Coca | and they are different | 18:30:22 |
| K900 | OK that's weird and I guess I missed this somehow | 18:30:48 |
| whispers (it/fae) | huh, i stand corrected | 18:35:38 |
