| 8 Nov 2024 |
 diniamo | Can you try nix build --dry-run github:diniamo/niqspkgs#coreutils-full-patched? | 18:51:51 |
| diniamo | For reference I'm currently on nix (Lix, like Nix) 2.92.0-devpre20241028_9c22a4d | 18:53:12 |
| diniamo | * Can you try nix build --accept-flake-config --dry-run github:diniamo/niqspkgs#coreutils-full-patched? | 18:54:49 |
 Acid Bong | In reply to @diniamo:matrix.org
Can you try nix build --accept-flake-config --dry-run github:diniamo/niqspkgs#coreutils-full-patched? Lix 2.91, stable
❯ nix build --accept-flake-config --dry-run github:diniamo/niqspkgs#coreutils-full-patched
these 2 derivations will be built:
/nix/store/li7vrffr819xy8rd1xx0q0d093b4ixic-advcpmv-0.9-9.5.patch.drv
/nix/store/wbj4jkykpkn3bsss9s3wkqzl7icx5jbd-coreutils-full-patched-9.5.drv
these 4 paths will be fetched (5.80 MiB download, 5.96 MiB unpacked):
/nix/store/6b8b8nmi6zbcccfhl800p107szd1ycf5-acl-2.3.2-dev
/nix/store/vpsb3af499936xv12gqh4dww6aygv24b-attr-2.5.2-dev
/nix/store/f5p28hbmwi3vx4bvsy1crqaiw0wrmnm3-coreutils-9.5.tar.xz
/nix/store/69gakqsrnl41gga5l8lwx668p9hz54mr-patchutils-0.3.3
| 19:39:09 |
| diniamo | Yeah, they shouldn't be built | 19:40:04 |
| diniamo | The path is present in the cache from what I can tell | 19:40:18 |
| Acid Bong | aha, found the issue: nixConfig should be a top-level attr, but you put it in outputs | 19:40:56 |
 aloisw | Is the ?priority=… parameter in substituters officially expected to work? It doesn't seem to work any more, and I don't find it in the documentation. | 19:53:26 |
| diniamo | In reply to @acidbong:envs.net
aha, found the issue: nixConfig should be a top-level attr, but you put it in outputs Still no luck. But the problem first occured while building my system config, which always had nixConfig in the right place | 20:00:03 |
|  Crazazy changed their display name from crazazy to Erik Oosting. | 20:04:17 |
| Crazazy changed their display name from Erik Oosting to Crazazy. | 20:05:11 |
| diniamo | Aaand nixpkgs nix works, fun | 20:20:45 |
 Lily Foster | In reply to @diniamo:matrix.org
Still no luck. But the problem first occured while building my system config, which always had nixConfig in the right place after you moved it to toplevel, it works here (nix (Lix, like Nix) 2.92.0-dev-pre20241102-763a61b). it's possibly using cached tarball if you're doing it via github:[...] flake ref | 20:29:13 |
| Acid Bong | In reply to @lily:lily.flowers
after you moved it to toplevel, it works here (nix (Lix, like Nix) 2.92.0-dev-pre20241102-763a61b). it's possibly using cached tarball if you're doing it via github:[...] flake ref can confirm for 2.91.1 as well | 20:30:22 |
| diniamo | Nop, it's still trying to build it even if I use a local ref | 20:50:11 |
| Acid Bong | I specified the commit and it warned me that i'm not a trusted user for that operation | 20:52:38 |
| Acid Bong | your remote repo seems to work | 20:52:47 |
| aloisw | In reply to @acidbong:envs.net
I specified the commit and it warned me that i'm not a trusted user for that operation If you're not trusted user, adding substituters client-side is not going to work. | 20:56:21 |
| Acid Bong | In reply to @aloisw:kde.org
If you're not trusted user, adding substituters client-side is not going to work. i meant it finally recognized that the flake sets additional substituters | 21:00:04 |
| diniamo | welp, updated lix, and still no | 21:01:02 |
| diniamo | no clue what to do at this point | 21:01:07 |
| diniamo | it works on nixpkgs lix as well | 21:19:50 |
| diniamo | could it be the stupid patch I use | 21:19:53 |
| 9 Nov 2024 |
| aloisw | What is the patch? | 04:44:58 |
| aloisw | I see you already reported a bug and it's a regression I introduced, so I will look into it. | 05:00:48 |
 Ramses 🇵🇸 | I noticed that the lix-daemon is not properly exiting when a machine gets shut down, systemd prints a message all the way at the end of the boot process, that it's waiting for the process to exit | 06:40:05 |
| Ramses 🇵🇸 | 
Download 21632.jpg | 06:40:24 |
| Ramses 🇵🇸 | It forcefully kills it eventually, but this slows down reboots considerably | 06:41:05 |
| Acid Bong | In reply to @rvdp:infosec.exchange
sent an image. what version and did you install it from source or from nixpkgs? | 07:10:18 |
| diniamo | In reply to @aloisw:kde.org
I see you already reported a bug and it's a regression I introduced, so I will look into it. Thanks a lot. Yeah, the patch is irrelevant, I can reproduce it on the latest commit, and could clearly bisect it. | 08:13:27 |
