| 8 Nov 2024 |
|  liv [she/her] changed their display name from olivia to liv [she/her]. | 04:17:38 |
|  toastal-matrix-sucks changed their display name from toastal to toastal-matrix-sucks. | 08:57:11 |
 antifuchs | huh, I have a github action that runs nix flake update on a checkout and I'm noticing that this command fetches all the inputs of the flake before updating inputs (which takes about 3/4 of the time to update)... is that necessary or can I avoid that? I would have expected the flake.lock to be the thing pertinent to that step... | 13:43:20 |
| antifuchs | OH WAIT it's downloading the new versions. never mind 🫠 | 13:45:22 |
 ma27 | hmm, did anybody see something like this before:
error: build of '/nix/store/pvf6nybnd3l1bvdi4m74mrfkya1m9gwm-vm-test-run-postgresql_anonymizer-postgresql-17.0.drv' on 'ssh-ng://roflmayr?&' failed: builder for '/nix/store/pvf6nybnd3l1bvdi4m74mrfkya1m9gwm-vm-test-run-postgresql_anonymizer-postgresql-17.0.drv' failed with exit code 1 ?
2.92.0-devpre20241103_b1a0e3c on both sides.
| 13:53:59 |
 K900 | Sounds like it just failed to build no? | 13:55:56 |
| ma27 | oh damn it I pasted the wrong line | 13:59:02 |
| ma27 | anyways now that you mention it, it's still irrelevant because it's still te result of a build failure | 13:59:16 |
| ma27 | sorry for the nosie, guess I should take a break rn | 13:59:23 |
 KFears (annoying) | Don't worry, happens. It's Friday, after all 🫠 | 14:04:23 |
| KFears (annoying) | I spent the whole day yesterday backporting a thing from CppNix and I get a test failure in one of the like completely unrelated tests and idk how to debug it, so I totally get the brain melt you might be experiencing | 14:05:30 |
|  kb (any Pronouns) changed their display name from kb01guy (he/him) to kb (any Pronouns). | 15:15:22 |
|  alice joined the room. | 15:19:37 |
 diniamo | Does anyone know why Lix isn't using substituters from flake configs anymore? Or at least that's the case from what I can tell | 18:50:29 |
| K900 | It definitely does for me | 18:51:22 |
| diniamo | Can you try nix build --dry-run github:diniamo/niqspkgs#coreutils-full-patched? | 18:51:51 |
| diniamo | For reference I'm currently on nix (Lix, like Nix) 2.92.0-devpre20241028_9c22a4d | 18:53:12 |
| diniamo | * Can you try nix build --accept-flake-config --dry-run github:diniamo/niqspkgs#coreutils-full-patched? | 18:54:49 |
 Acid Bong | In reply to @diniamo:matrix.org
Can you try nix build --accept-flake-config --dry-run github:diniamo/niqspkgs#coreutils-full-patched? Lix 2.91, stable
❯ nix build --accept-flake-config --dry-run github:diniamo/niqspkgs#coreutils-full-patched
these 2 derivations will be built:
/nix/store/li7vrffr819xy8rd1xx0q0d093b4ixic-advcpmv-0.9-9.5.patch.drv
/nix/store/wbj4jkykpkn3bsss9s3wkqzl7icx5jbd-coreutils-full-patched-9.5.drv
these 4 paths will be fetched (5.80 MiB download, 5.96 MiB unpacked):
/nix/store/6b8b8nmi6zbcccfhl800p107szd1ycf5-acl-2.3.2-dev
/nix/store/vpsb3af499936xv12gqh4dww6aygv24b-attr-2.5.2-dev
/nix/store/f5p28hbmwi3vx4bvsy1crqaiw0wrmnm3-coreutils-9.5.tar.xz
/nix/store/69gakqsrnl41gga5l8lwx668p9hz54mr-patchutils-0.3.3
| 19:39:09 |
| diniamo | Yeah, they shouldn't be built | 19:40:04 |
| diniamo | The path is present in the cache from what I can tell | 19:40:18 |
| Acid Bong | aha, found the issue: nixConfig should be a top-level attr, but you put it in outputs | 19:40:56 |
 @aloisw:kde.org | Is the ?priority=… parameter in substituters officially expected to work? It doesn't seem to work any more, and I don't find it in the documentation. | 19:53:26 |
| diniamo | In reply to @acidbong:envs.net
aha, found the issue: nixConfig should be a top-level attr, but you put it in outputs Still no luck. But the problem first occured while building my system config, which always had nixConfig in the right place | 20:00:03 |
|  Crazazy changed their display name from crazazy to Erik Oosting. | 20:04:17 |
| Crazazy changed their display name from Erik Oosting to Crazazy. | 20:05:11 |
| diniamo | Aaand nixpkgs nix works, fun | 20:20:45 |
 Lily Foster | In reply to @diniamo:matrix.org
Still no luck. But the problem first occured while building my system config, which always had nixConfig in the right place after you moved it to toplevel, it works here (nix (Lix, like Nix) 2.92.0-dev-pre20241102-763a61b). it's possibly using cached tarball if you're doing it via github:[...] flake ref | 20:29:13 |
| Acid Bong | In reply to @lily:lily.flowers
after you moved it to toplevel, it works here (nix (Lix, like Nix) 2.92.0-dev-pre20241102-763a61b). it's possibly using cached tarball if you're doing it via github:[...] flake ref can confirm for 2.91.1 as well | 20:30:22 |
