| 3 Nov 2025 |
|  Katie joined the room. | 20:43:47 |
| Katie | Is this the right room for questions? | 20:44:04 |
| Katie set a profile picture. | 20:44:58 |
 bandithedoge | if they are about lix | 20:45:14 |
| Katie | Okay great. I | 20:45:24 |
| Katie | * Okay great, I just wasn't sure. I'm still a little new to Matrix, but I didn't see like a questions or help room or anything. | 20:46:25 |
| Katie | I wanted to ask if there was rationale on the pipe operator being gated behind a different feature flag in Lix than in Nix | 20:46:59 |
| Katie | I couldn't find one? But Google sucks now, so I don't necessarily feel confident that means one isn't written down somewhere. | 20:48:06 |
| Katie | (For reference in Nix the flag is pipe-operators (plural) whereas it seems Lix uses pipe-operator (singular) | 20:48:55 |
| Katie | * For reference in Nix the flag is pipe-operators (plural) whereas it seems Lix uses pipe-operator (singular) | 20:49:37 |
 @dawnofmidnight:catgirl.cloud | Lix currently only implements the forward pipe (|>), not both | 20:49:52 |
| Katie | Ohhh interesting | 20:50:05 |
| Katie | That makes sense | 20:50:24 |
| @dawnofmidnight:catgirl.cloud | nevermind, i just tried it and may be incorrect? (lix 2.94.0pre-acf6e1c) | 20:52:55 |
| @dawnofmidnight:catgirl.cloud | * nevermind, i just tried it and may be incorrect? (lix 2.94.0pre-acf6e1c) both seem to work | 20:54:05 |
| @dawnofmidnight:catgirl.cloud | ah, it was that it's not guaranteed it'll be kept around https://matrix.to/#/!9IQChSjwSHXPPWTa:lix.systems/$m2XyHW25YQPEPcOVgpyZ8cN-WLFgwJUPm3HsXI7iAUY?via=lix.systems&via=matrix.org | 20:58:12 |
| @dawnofmidnight:catgirl.cloud | * ah, it was that it's not guaranteed the backwards pipe will be kept around, see https://matrix.to/#/!9IQChSjwSHXPPWTa:lix.systems/$m2XyHW25YQPEPcOVgpyZ8cN-WLFgwJUPm3HsXI7iAUY?via=lix.systems&via=matrix.org | 20:58:29 |
| Katie | And it looks like the Lix impl predates the Nix one | 21:04:26 |
| Katie | I imagine Lix also may have simply named the flag after the RFC (which would be sensible) so Nix NOT doing that is... annoying | 21:05:16 |
| Katie | Okay, thank you very much! | 21:06:41 |
| Katie | Another question: How does nix-darwin detection work? I keep running the uninstaller but /nix/nix-installer uninstall keeps claiming to detect it | 21:24:04 |
| Katie | * Another question: How does nix-darwin detection work? I keep running the uninstaller but /nix/nix-installer uninstall keeps claiming to detect it
EDIT: Okay, I think I figured this one out on my own, I don't think I read far enough here: https://git.lix.systems/lix-project/lix-installer#uninstalling | 21:28:13 |
| Katie | * Another question: How does nix-darwin detection work? I keep running the uninstaller but /nix/nix-installer uninstall keeps claiming to detect it
EDIT: Okay, I think I figured this one out on my own, I don't think I had read far enough here: https://git.lix.systems/lix-project/lix-installer#uninstalling | 21:34:00 |
| 4 Nov 2025 |
|  whispers (it/fae) joined the room. | 00:45:18 |
| @dawnofmidnight:catgirl.cloud left the room. | 00:48:32 |
|  yamabukiiro joined the room. | 03:38:36 |
|  cafkafk changed their profile picture. | 08:23:30 |
|  ncfavier changed their profile picture. | 23:55:14 |
| 5 Nov 2025 |
|  UlyssesZhan joined the room. | 04:57:29 |
 aleksi | Has anybody else encountered a segfault in the Clang linker, when cross-compiling Lix x86_64-linux->armv7l-linux? | 11:33:52 |
