| 2 Nov 2025 |
 Sofie 🏳️⚧️ (she/her) | fucking finally | 22:05:21 |
 Blastboom Strice | Yay | 22:05:56 |
| Sofie 🏳️⚧️ (she/her) | lets say you have an option like
services.klipper
and you want to build an another option that also includes configuration for moonraker and stuff like that
what name would you put it under? like, I mean, the best would be your own like modules.services.klipper?
idk if this sounds dumb
how would you organize a module directory which would have these both
| 22:14:33 |
 QuadRadical (Ping) | `services.clipper.moonraker` maybe? | 23:16:15 |
| QuadRadical (Ping) | just add the options you need? | 23:16:20 |
| QuadRadical (Ping) | services.clipper.moonraker maybe? | 23:16:56 |
| 3 Nov 2025 |
|  marshmallow changed their profile picture. | 07:45:58 |
|  @jlb69:matrix.org left the room. | 09:42:45 |
|  Katie joined the room. | 20:43:47 |
| Katie | Is this the right room for questions? | 20:44:04 |
| Katie set a profile picture. | 20:44:58 |
 bandithedoge | if they are about lix | 20:45:14 |
| Katie | Okay great. I | 20:45:24 |
| Katie | * Okay great, I just wasn't sure. I'm still a little new to Matrix, but I didn't see like a questions or help room or anything. | 20:46:25 |
| Katie | I wanted to ask if there was rationale on the pipe operator being gated behind a different feature flag in Lix than in Nix | 20:46:59 |
| Katie | I couldn't find one? But Google sucks now, so I don't necessarily feel confident that means one isn't written down somewhere. | 20:48:06 |
| Katie | (For reference in Nix the flag is pipe-operators (plural) whereas it seems Lix uses pipe-operator (singular) | 20:48:55 |
| Katie | * For reference in Nix the flag is pipe-operators (plural) whereas it seems Lix uses pipe-operator (singular) | 20:49:37 |
 @dawnofmidnight:catgirl.cloud | Lix currently only implements the forward pipe (|>), not both | 20:49:52 |
| Katie | Ohhh interesting | 20:50:05 |
| Katie | That makes sense | 20:50:24 |
| @dawnofmidnight:catgirl.cloud | nevermind, i just tried it and may be incorrect? (lix 2.94.0pre-acf6e1c) | 20:52:55 |
| @dawnofmidnight:catgirl.cloud | * nevermind, i just tried it and may be incorrect? (lix 2.94.0pre-acf6e1c) both seem to work | 20:54:05 |
| @dawnofmidnight:catgirl.cloud | ah, it was that it's not guaranteed it'll be kept around https://matrix.to/#/!9IQChSjwSHXPPWTa:lix.systems/$m2XyHW25YQPEPcOVgpyZ8cN-WLFgwJUPm3HsXI7iAUY?via=lix.systems&via=matrix.org | 20:58:12 |
| @dawnofmidnight:catgirl.cloud | * ah, it was that it's not guaranteed the backwards pipe will be kept around, see https://matrix.to/#/!9IQChSjwSHXPPWTa:lix.systems/$m2XyHW25YQPEPcOVgpyZ8cN-WLFgwJUPm3HsXI7iAUY?via=lix.systems&via=matrix.org | 20:58:29 |
| Katie | And it looks like the Lix impl predates the Nix one | 21:04:26 |
| Katie | I imagine Lix also may have simply named the flag after the RFC (which would be sensible) so Nix NOT doing that is... annoying | 21:05:16 |
| Katie | Okay, thank you very much! | 21:06:41 |
| Katie | Another question: How does nix-darwin detection work? I keep running the uninstaller but /nix/nix-installer uninstall keeps claiming to detect it | 21:24:04 |
| Katie | * Another question: How does nix-darwin detection work? I keep running the uninstaller but /nix/nix-installer uninstall keeps claiming to detect it
EDIT: Okay, I think I figured this one out on my own, I don't think I read far enough here: https://git.lix.systems/lix-project/lix-installer#uninstalling | 21:28:13 |
