| 1 Feb 2026 |
0x4fbb09 it/its ⛯✇ΘΔ | # nix flake check --all-systems
Do you want to allow configuration setting 'allow-import-from-derivation' to be set to 'false'?
This may allow the flake to gain root, see the nix.conf manual page (yes/no/No to all)
... that last line isn't true for this specific setting, right? i assume it's done for all configuration settings, would it be practical to not warn about getting root for known-safe options? (still ask if the user wants it, but the warning about "this may allow the flake to gain root" isn't true for those settings.) (it is true for the trusted-substitutor that tried to add cachix, which i rejected)
| 12:08:46 |
Sofie 🏳️⚧️ (she/her) | error:
… while checking flake output 'nixosConfigurations'
… while checking the NixOS configuration 'nixosConfigurations.tailstack'
… while calling the 'head' builtin
at /nix/store/syvzk0psc8m51z4024qr4i0kx9k14dqz-source/lib/attrsets.nix:1713:13:
1712| if length values == 1 || pred here (elemAt values 1) (head values) then
1713| head values
| ^
1714| else
(stack trace truncated; use '--show-trace' to show the full trace)
error: No device specified for mount point ‘/etc/ssh’.
| 13:39:02 |
Sofie 🏳️⚧️ (she/her) | ?? | 13:39:15 |
Sofie 🏳️⚧️ (she/her) | using impermance? | 13:39:20 |
Sofie 🏳️⚧️ (she/her) | and sops-nix | 13:39:40 |
Sofie 🏳️⚧️ (she/her) | ah | 13:44:53 |
Sofie 🏳️⚧️ (she/her) | fixed it | 13:44:54 |
Sofie 🏳️⚧️ (she/her) | somehow | 13:44:55 |
| 13 May 2024 |
| zrsk joined the room. | 13:37:30 |
| dariof4 joined the room. | 14:16:05 |
| abbe joined the room. | 14:42:22 |
mjm | lix is now in nixos-unstable, what's the best way to use it in a NixOS config? | 15:47:41 |
K900 | nix.package = pkgs.lix | 15:47:54 |
K900 | Probably | 15:47:58 |
K900 | Or just keep using the module | 15:48:02 |
puck | you can use nix.package = pkgs.lix; if you want; but using the overlay will guarantee more updates (tho less binary cache) | 15:48:44 |
mjm | well, the module/overlay doesn't easily support using the one from nixpkgs | 15:48:44 |
mjm | i do want more binary cache | 15:49:21 |
mjm | yeah i guess i'll just do nix.package then | 15:50:43 |
raitobezarius | to have binary cache and HEAD, we will probably need to track the channels and bolt a lix on there and rebuild with our own CI then push in our binary cache | 17:33:17 |
Charles | What's lix using as its binary cache? Attic? | 17:34:36 |
| Arian left the room. | 17:37:44 |
@tc424:glasgow.social | Last I heard they were using garage as the back end, and think about attic | 17:39:11 |
@tc424:glasgow.social | I don't know if that means they're just pushing directly into garage's s3 interface for the moment | 17:39:36 |
@tc424:glasgow.social | * Last I heard they were using garage as the back end, and thinking about attic | 17:39:57 |
raitobezarius | In reply to @charles:computer.surgery What's lix using as its binary cache? Attic? garage without attic | 17:41:16 |
raitobezarius | it's homemade just nix push thingie | 17:41:24 |
raitobezarius | and nix sign | 17:41:25 |
Qyriad | yep | 17:44:26 |
@tc424:glasgow.social | I've just given up on attic due to weird non-deterministic auth problems that nobody else seems to have experienced | 17:44:31 |