| 19 Dec 2025 |
 K900 | Huh OK that's a stable nixpkgs thing then | 18:29:11 |
| K900 | I'm too much of an unstable user I guess | 18:29:16 |
 Coca | 
Download image.png | 18:30:12 |
| Coca | I'm on unstable as well | 18:30:18 |
| Coca | and they are different | 18:30:22 |
| K900 | OK that's weird and I guess I missed this somehow | 18:30:48 |
 whispers (it/fae) | huh, i stand corrected | 18:35:38 |
 Rutile (rootile) | where can i send money to support lix / -infra? | 19:04:19 |
 neobrain | Heh I see, yeah I can relate how it's not the most pressing task to sit down and write automation for 😅 | 19:36:29 |
|  PopeRigby changed their display name from PopeRigby to "PopeRigby (UTC-8)". | 20:01:58 |
| PopeRigby changed their display name from "PopeRigby (UTC-8)" to PopeRigby. | 20:03:08 |
|  Bakbukdibbuk joined the room. | 21:27:17 |
| 20 Dec 2025 |
 just1602 | In reply to @k900:0upti.me
OK that's weird and I guess I missed this somehow I think the idea was to have 2.92 and then 2.93 as latest but keep 2.91 as stable due to the regression present in latest. | 05:56:13 |
|  Acid Bong joined the room. | 07:20:47 |
| Acid Bong | moin. i noticed that Nix and Lix do nix flake check differently: Nix evaluates everything in alphabetic order, but Lix's order is different. what's the specifics of this? | 07:26:02 |
 Sofie 🏳️⚧️ (she/her) | Me too is wondering this | 09:20:48 |
| Sofie 🏳️⚧️ (she/her) | I have hardware too ;) | 09:21:01 |
| K900 | Hardware is hard because of trust concerns | 09:49:28 |
| K900 | For money there's afnix opencollective | 09:49:50 |
| K900 | https://opencollective.com/afnix/donate | 09:49:50 |
| K900 | But I'm not sure there's any particular expenses that will go to right now, you'd have to ask probably @raitobezarius | 09:50:17 |
 raitobezarius | I'd argue that money and hardware is not something we are lacking of | 11:08:36 |
| raitobezarius | Hands on the project or joining the AFNix infrastructure team as a volunteer is probably something we would appreciate even more | 11:09:03 |
