!9IQChSjwSHXPPWTa:lix.systems

Lix

1119 Members
Lix user channel. Feel free to discuss on-topic issues here and give each other help. For matrix.to links to the rest of the Lix channels, see: https://wiki.lix.systems/books/lix-organisation/page/matrix-rooms302 Servers

You have reached the beginning of time (for this room).


SenderMessageTime
25 Dec 2025
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusGood to know, I will open issues to see what to do about that, thanks!04:19:20
@esperlily:matrix.orgEsperLily [she/her]that's actually a good question, i have it set up as an extra substituter in my configuration but i don't remember why04:31:56
@esperlily:matrix.orgEsperLily [she/her]was it recommended at one point to use past installation?04:32:11
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusThe installer automatically put it04:33:16
@esperlily:matrix.orgEsperLily [she/her]no i added it to my nix-darwin configuration, in a commit 19 months ago that just says "Add cache settings for cache.lix.systems"04:34:18
@esperlily:matrix.orgEsperLily [she/her]i'm deleting it now of course, but i don't know why i added it in the first place, and searching for it in the current docs just shows it as part of an installer invocation. perhaps 19 months ago there was a different recommendation04:36:41
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusWe definitely had it recommended in the very first days and it was a bad idea given we never populated it meaningfully with cached nightly builds04:37:53
@esperlily:matrix.orgEsperLily [she/her]alright that would explain it then, since i switched during the early days04:38:05
@flacks:matrix.orgflacks changed their display name from flax to flacks.08:42:59
@cyclopentane:aidoskyneen.eupentane changed their display name from pentane ⭔ to pentane (DECT CYPT/2978).11:23:34
@drezil:kif.rocksNicole/Drezil 🏳️‍⚧️ (she/her) changed their profile picture.13:08:40
@sofiedotcafe:matrix.orgSofie 🏳️‍⚧️ (she/her)https://nesbitt.io/2025/12/24/package-managers-keep-using-git-as-a-database.html15:19:55
@k900:0upti.meK900Except nixpkgs also exists as snapshot tarballs that we host ourselves?15:28:04
@k900:0upti.meK900Like, "nixpkgs is giving github issues" is a "nixpkgs is a big repo" problem15:28:13
@k900:0upti.meK900Not a "nixpkgs uses git" problem15:28:17
@lotte:chir.rsLotte (it/its)/Cinny (she/her) θΔ&

git handles big repos more poorly than they need to be

although nixpkgs still needs a significant amount of the repo checked out to function i think

15:35:06
@kfears:matrix.orgKFears (they/them)Nixpkgs is given as an example of a big tepo that is also kind of a package registry15:35:14
@kfears:matrix.orgKFears (they/them)Not as an example of the fully traditional package registry15:35:25
@kfears:matrix.orgKFears (they/them)Point here being is that if you push enough shit into git, it will fall apart15:35:44
@lotte:chir.rsLotte (it/its)/Cinny (she/her) θΔ&if IFD was cheap i think nixpkgs could be way lighter than a git repo checkout or a tarball15:39:45
@k900:0upti.meK900 Git is fine at nixpkgs scale honestly 16:22:25
@k900:0upti.meK900 Github on the other hand 16:22:32
@piegames:flausch.socialpiegamesI think that post is less relevant for Nixpkgs itself and more for whatever comes after Flakes17:08:33

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 10