| 21 Oct 2024 |
 crop | In reply to @piegames:flausch.social
Some regressions introduced with 2.4 still have not been fixed, and this issue may very well be one of them i just tested it on nix 2.3.18 because this is used in the nix-shell of npins and there i have the issue as well. | 14:06:23 |
 ma27 | would you mind checking if the error persists on lix master? (you only need to update the CLI, not the daemon).
I fixed a few 2.3 compat issues related to fetchGit/fetchTree and I'd be curious if this already fixed your issue. | 15:11:09 |
| crop | The repl reproducer above should show the problem | 15:12:35 |
| crop | In reply to @crop_tech:matrix.org
this nix-repl> builtins.fetchGit { url = "https://git.lix.systems/lix-project/lix.git"; rev = "ad9d06f7838a25beec425ff406fe68721fef73be"; }
needs that allRefs = true is added ... but i think this is not compatible to nix 2.3 which is the nix version used in the shell of npins ...
i wonder whats the reason for using such a old version of nix. ^ | 15:12:46 |
| crop | In reply to @colons:vscary.co
the commit with commit message 'release: 2.91.1 "Dragon's Breath"' in the release-2.91 branch is not ad9d06f7 https://git.lix.systems/lix-project/lix/commits/branch/release-2.91 which verion of nix/lix are you using? | 15:28:43 |
 piegames | In reply to @ma27:nicht-so.sexy
would you mind checking if the error persists on lix master? (you only need to update the CLI, not the daemon).
I fixed a few 2.3 compat issues related to fetchGit/fetchTree and I'd be curious if this already fixed your issue. still broken AFAICT | 16:45:31 |
 jakehamilton | Is there someone I can DM about the bagel shaped thing that isn't a bagel? (Wanted to share something, but not sure if y'all are wanting stuff public) | 20:40:08 |
 WeetHet | I don't know if this is an appropriate place to ask, but is the new Determinate Nix closed source and if yes, how is it not breaking the LGPL license of cppnix? | 20:41:38 |
 K900 | It's not closed source | 20:42:36 |
| K900 | The determinate-nixd binary is | 20:42:46 |
| K900 | But it's not linking directly to cppnix so it's fine, technically | 20:42:57 |
| K900 | Whether it's fine ethically, well, I'll refrain from making public statements on that | 20:43:27 |
 raitobezarius | In reply to @jakehamilton:auxolotl.org
Is there someone I can DM about the bagel shaped thing that isn't a bagel? (Wanted to share something, but not sure if y'all are wanting stuff public) You can DM me | 20:47:23 |
 KFears (tragedy arc) | In reply to @k900:0upti.me
Whether it's fine ethically, well, I'll refrain from making public statements on that One might enjoy greatly the fact that I'm not any public figure and have spoken at length my opinions on that :) | 20:47:55 |
| WeetHet | In reply to @k900:0upti.me
It's not closed source Reading the docs:
At the moment, the Nix in Determinate Nix matches the upstream version. In the future, however, Determinate Nix will include patches that have not yet been released by the upstream project.
It will be interesting to see how they implement that. Also, just because of DetSys' sheer power in the nix community, these features will be pushed to be merged a lot more, as it's financially more efficient than having to resolve merge conflicts all the time
| 20:48:22 |
| K900 | I can only wish them best of luck with that | 20:49:13 |
| K900 | Given the amount of fun and exciting issues Nix upgrades have already been causing in nixpkgs | 20:49:31 |
| K900 | There's no way this could possibly go even more wrong | 20:49:43 |
| jakehamilton | In reply to@raitobezarius:matrix.org
You can DM me TY
Janik got in touch just now, but I may ping you at some point :) | 20:50:17 |
| KFears (tragedy arc) | Yeah, whatever they are going to try, with even less manpower than they have now, with even less competence than they have now, good luck to them | 20:50:32 |
 tc424 (Steve D) | Redacted or Malformed Event | 20:53:35 |
| KFears (tragedy arc) | Also, I've been working with DetSys installer a lot lately and, uhh, how do I say it | 20:54:10 |
| tc424 (Steve D) | In reply to@k900:0upti.me
Whether it's fine ethically, well, I'll refrain from making public statements on that Oh god, what fresh hell is this? :( | 20:54:12 |
| tc424 (Steve D) | Not good vibes | 20:54:29 |
| KFears (tragedy arc) | There are issues | 20:54:30 |
| KFears (tragedy arc) | Many | 20:54:38 |
| KFears (tragedy arc) | Fundamental ones, too | 20:54:42 |
| KFears (tragedy arc) | Well, I see it more as an official death penalty to CppNix rather than something that actually changes things, so that's just something that was already in the air since Eelco wasn't permabanned from the community, just not made official | 20:56:51 |
| KFears (tragedy arc) | Also, bending over backwards to not break GPL by "supervising regular daemon" (whatever that means) sounds like a lot of fun | 20:58:00 |
| KFears (tragedy arc) | Especially since CppNix isn't exactly known for being well-integrated into, well, anything | 20:58:22 |
