| 5 Feb 2026 |
 piegames | https://git.lix.systems/lix-project/lix/src/branch/main/lix/libexpr/nixexpr.hh#L619 | 00:40:27 |
| piegames | (isInterpolation used to be called forceString IIRC, but that name was even more confusing) | 00:41:07 |
 antifuchs | In reply to @piegames:flausch.social
Okay so, + is not addition, it is string concatenation :) Nice, that’s even more cursed | 01:03:54 |
 koaledu | Every day we stray further from God. | 01:06:09 |
 Emma [it/its] | hm, is there a way to parallelise a flake update? | 02:04:30 |
| Emma [it/its] | given that -j doesn't seem to be applicable here | 02:04:58 |
 Coca | I thought flakes updated concurrently already but that's probably not true | 02:15:57 |
| Emma [it/its] | they dont (can check with -v) | 02:19:21 |
| Coca | Hm, that makes npins the only pinner that's concurrent then in the nix ecosystem then I think | 02:20:56 |
| Coca | Weird nobody has done it before | 02:21:17 |
| Coca | * Hm, that makes npins the only pinner that's concurrent then in the nix ecosystem I think | 02:21:26 |
 Sofie 🏳️⚧️ (she/her) | https://github.com/sofiedotcafe/luminarie/blob/068213a191113d3691f7c226e42bc3d360a6780c/hosts/tailstack/disko.nix | 17:20:14 |
| Sofie 🏳️⚧️ (she/her) | module.tailstack.module.disko.null_resource.disko (remote-exec): + cryptsetup status crypt-dpool-hdd0
module.tailstack.module.disko.null_resource.disko (remote-exec): + cryptsetup open /dev/disk/by-partlabel/disk-hdd0-dpool crypt-dpool-hdd0 --key-file /dev/fd/63
module.tailstack.module.disko.null_resource.disko (remote-exec): ++ set +x
module.tailstack.module.disko.null_resource.disko (remote-exec): Device /dev/disk/by-partlabel/disk-hdd0-dpool does not exist or access denied.
╷
│ Error: remote-exec provisioner error
│
│ with module.tailstack.module.disko.null_resource.disko,
│ on ../../modules/nixos_host/submodules/disko/main.tf line 14, in resource "null_resource" "disko":
│ 14: provisioner "remote-exec" {
│
│ error executing "/tmp/terraform_508773335.sh": Process exited with status 4
╵ | 17:20:18 |
| Sofie 🏳️⚧️ (she/her) | hmmmmm | 17:20:20 |
| Sofie 🏳️⚧️ (she/her) | ah | 17:22:40 |
| Sofie 🏳️⚧️ (she/her) | a state thing? | 17:22:43 |
| Sofie 🏳️⚧️ (she/her) | yeah, it was it | 17:23:46 |
 raitobezarius | Feels like you got the channel wrong again | 17:26:45 |
| raitobezarius | How can we avoid this reoccurring every time and now? | 17:26:58 |
| Sofie 🏳️⚧️ (she/her) | ooppss | 17:27:51 |
| Sofie 🏳️⚧️ (she/her) | i have to switch clients | 17:27:55 |
| Sofie 🏳️⚧️ (she/her) | they look so same | 17:27:58 |
| Sofie 🏳️⚧️ (she/her) | sorry | 17:28:00 |
| Sofie 🏳️⚧️ (she/her) | really ;3 | 17:28:01 |
 neobrain | Is there any inherent reason that Lix doesn't indicate percentual progress when fetching flakes but instead only shows an absolute in-progress download size? | 20:42:41 |
 delroth | yes-ish as there's a freeze on any development related to flakes in Lix which makes it unlikely for such improvements to get done, but other than that probably not? it might use a different download infrastructure from the rest of the downloads in Lix because flakes code tends to be a bit weird and sectioned off | 21:19:14 |
| neobrain | Aw, fair enough. Do the non-flake code paths show a percentual progress? It didn't actually occur to me that flakes might be different and just used the term as a shorthand for "fetching [e.g.] nixpkgs" | 21:29:58 |
| neobrain | * Aw, fair enough. But are you implying that the non-flake code paths already do show a percentual progress? It didn't actually occur to me that flakes might be different and just used the term as a shorthand for "fetching [e.g.] nixpkgs" | 21:30:23 |
| neobrain | Redacted or Malformed Event | 21:41:35 |
| neobrain | * eh, looks like it does show the expected total size in contrast to flakes, just that the expected total size is wrong 😅
❯ nix eval --raw github:NixOS/nixpkgs/nixos-25.05#hello
[21.7 MiB/2.3 KiB DL] downloading 'https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/archive/ac62194c3917d5f474c1a844b6fd6da2db95077d.tar.gz'`
| 21:42:08 |
