Sender | Message | Time |
---|---|---|
11 Dec 2024 | ||
Capypara | It shouldn't, but I'm using Jovian (NixOS modules and packages to replicate SteamOS), so it could also be a bug there. | 17:47:17 |
aloisw | nix-diff can be very useful for investigating this kind of stuff. | 17:48:21 |
leo60228 | In reply to @emma:rory.gaywell you can make a binary format diff using the packfile format with git bundle create out.bundle commit~1..commit | 21:18:13 |
leo60228 | In reply to @emma:rory.gaywdym? git diff is its own diff implementation (you can use it standalone with git diff --no-index ) | 21:19:06 |
12 Dec 2024 | ||
atagen | I noticed Lix uses a canary in the overlay to prevent being overlaid twice.. I'm facing something kind of similar with another overlay I'm consuming, where it applies twice if I specify it in different modules I consume and breaks everything - is this just a corner of nix where there be dragons and there is really no other way? | 02:37:13 |
atagen | * I noticed Lix uses a canary in the overlay to prevent being overlaid twice.. I'm facing something kind of similar with another overlay I'm consuming, where it applies twice if I specify it in each of several modules I consume, breaking everything - is this just a corner of nix where there be dragons and there is really no other way? | 02:37:39 |
piegames | Yes | 06:29:39 |
Joscha joined the room. | 08:46:08 | |
13 Dec 2024 | ||
LilleCarl (Salsa9) joined the room. | 02:04:37 | |
@acidbong:envs.net | i see 2.91 branch hasn't been updated in 2 months, will all the further commits go to 2.92? | 19:00:15 |
piegames | Yes, that's how the release cycle goes | 19:09:00 |
@acidbong:envs.net | epic | 19:12:47 |
14 Dec 2024 | ||
jakra | XJ1145c | 12:17:26 |
mrtz joined the room. | 12:28:32 | |
@acidbong:envs.net | wut? | 12:32:54 |
antifuchs | Catlike typing detected | 14:21:37 |
nim65s | maybe a password, but not a very strong one 😅 | 16:25:12 |
tebriel joined the room. | 17:08:14 | |
Duanin2 joined the room. | 18:10:24 | |
Adda left the room. | 18:22:01 | |
Adda joined the room. | 18:24:01 | |
Soliprem joined the room. | 18:42:42 | |
aftix | lix is adding ?rev= to locked tarball urls in flake.lock, specifically for git.lix.systems. ex: "url": "https://git.lix.systems/api/v1/repos/lix-project/nixos-module/archive/<sha>.tar.gz?rev=<sha>" this only happens with the lix and lix-module input, and my CI on github that's using cppnix 2.24 really does not like it and fails anytime it gets through. I'm on 2.92.0-dev-pre20241211-92ed9fe | 20:56:50 |
KFears (annoying) | You might be hitting this? https://git.lix.systems/lix-project/lix/issues/472 | 21:53:06 |
15 Dec 2024 | ||
ghpzin | Both should resolve to url with ?rev=<sha> because response has header with link and rel="immutable" that looks that way: | 06:20:58 |
ghpzin | Both should resolve to url with ?rev=<sha> because response has header with link and rel="immutable" that looks that way: | 06:21:21 |
ember joined the room. | 16:08:42 | |
ember | Hey, I have an issue with nix-store-paths being copied to the nix-store and therefore evals taking much longer.
(output shortened for brevity) when I don't set the flake registry, this does not happen:
My first thought was, that it might be this issue (on nix, but the same if-statement is also in lix' codebase), but even then the path written to the registry does not end with | 16:22:13 |
ember | * Hey, I have an issue with nix-store-paths being copied to the nix-store and therefore evals taking much longer.
(output shortened for brevity) when I don't set the flake registry, this does not happen:
(also shortened, but only removed some duplicate messages) My first thought was, that it might be this issue (on nix, but the same if-statement is also in lix' codebase), but even then the path written to the registry does not end with | 16:23:08 |
ember | I'm running lix 2.91.1 | 16:23:39 |