| 28 Jan 2026 |
 raitobezarius | we do that but i think that people doesn't have their eyes on the channel | 14:46:41 |
 niko âĄď¸ | Yes I realized, but even if I click on it in mobile, there's no way to join said channel | 14:47:11 |
| niko âĄď¸ | Which makes the announcement pretty useless | 14:47:17 |
| raitobezarius | good to know | 14:48:15 |
 delroth | also I'm discovering today that even if you subscribe to channels, if you don't also subscribe to topics within those channels they don't show up in combined view / recent conversations :/ | 14:50:29 |
| delroth | or maybe it does and it's just not retroactive? no clue | 14:51:07 |
| delroth | weird UX regardless | 14:51:13 |
| raitobezarius | non retroactive i think yes | 15:03:44 |
|  Lampguy đď¸ changed their profile picture. | 15:04:05 |
| Lampguy đď¸ changed their display name from ŮŮŮŮاŮ
ٞس to Lampguy đď¸. | 17:05:26 |
 KFears (they/them) | In reply to @coca162:matrix.org
pinning inputs and schemas are two pretty different things for a single tool to handle, so most focus on one or the other Perhaps both are needed. Looking at npm, cargo and other good package managers, they combine locking with schemas, but they do it in a less awkward way than flakes | 18:38:27 |
| KFears (they/them) | In reply to @delroth:delroth.net
or maybe it does and it's just not retroactive? no clue Yeah, it's not retroactive. I'm subscribed to channels in both Zulips and I keep track of stuff in combined view | 18:43:23 |
| KFears (they/them) | It's hard to keep track of new channels though, yeah | 18:44:02 |
|  blue changed their profile picture. | 23:39:52 |
| 29 Jan 2026 |
 llakala | In reply to @piegames:flausch.social
I mean npins is fairly feature complete by now and in need of a successor, so I'm interested in hearing your show-stoppers for using it as a (relatively) happy npins user, I find json to be a horrible experience | 00:08:30 |
| llakala | i think cli-driven is a lot worse than file-driven, and i'd prefer something that followed the flake concept of a source of truth and a lockfile | 00:09:29 |
| llakala | think npins.toml, npins.lock | 00:09:46 |
 Sofie đłď¸ââ§ď¸ (she/her) | This! | 09:10:44 |
| Sofie đłď¸ââ§ď¸ (she/her) | That's one thing flakes did right | 09:10:58 |
| Sofie đłď¸ââ§ď¸ (she/her) | idk, I'll maybe just stick with flakes due to e.g. nix run | 09:11:29 |
 aloisw | nix run also works without flakes, using -f the same way as the other commands. | 09:12:03 |
| Sofie đłď¸ââ§ď¸ (she/her) | ah | 09:14:52 |
| Sofie đłď¸ââ§ď¸ (she/her) | How do I use config inside home manager which is inside nixos? | 10:18:59 |
 neobrain | Running off nixpks without a local clone is a bit awkward with that though, isn't it? | 10:20:12 |
| Sofie đłď¸ââ§ď¸ (she/her) | I get like
error: The option home-manager.users.sofie.catppuccin' does not exist. Definition values: In /nix/store/2d7lnrfk6w9lqfmlirbl3ga9y3rp8k2x-source/modules/home/desktop/gnome/catppuccin/qt":
| 10:20:48 |
| Sofie đłď¸ââ§ď¸ (she/her) | Even when it's defined | 10:20:59 |
| Sofie đłď¸ââ§ď¸ (she/her) | But this works with a different host? | 10:21:19 |
| Sofie đłď¸ââ§ď¸ (she/her) | Maybe because it has already deployed it before but idk | 10:21:32 |
| aloisw | nix run -f '<nixpkgs>'? | 10:27:17 |
| KFears (they/them) | Use osConfig instead of config | 10:42:21 |
