| 18 Jan 2026 |
 hexa | off-topic | 15:27:35 |
 Sofie 🏳️⚧️ (she/her) | 👍 | 15:40:37 |
 Erin · she/her · 🏳️⚧️🏳️🌈 | I thought of using impermanence but not sure how good idea would it be for desktop, also considering i almost never reboot | 15:48:10 |
|  isabel changed their profile picture. | 20:43:49 |
| 19 Jan 2026 |
|  bl1nk changed their profile picture. | 10:39:40 |
|  Kaybee (any) changed their display name from Kaybee (any) [52890] to Kaybee (any). | 12:53:01 |
 Linux Hackerman | I'm currently getting FAILED ../tests/functional2/build/test_xattrs.py::test_xattrs_during_build[files0] when building lix from main (7d76467) on macos, is that missing a skip? | 20:15:57 |
 just1602 | Are you running the latest commit, because I think the skip were added already? | 20:16:55 |
 raitobezarius | it should be a skipif I think yeah | 20:21:08 |
 Arian | Is there some way to have a pkgs.closureInfo that adds a drv as if you had done a substitution? Now if you ad a drv path it adds the entire build-time closure | 20:57:24 |
| Arian | Basically; can I in nix create a disk image that has a nix store that looks like it did a nix-instantiate && nix-store--realize where it substituted everything | 20:57:53 |
| raitobezarius | In reply to @arianvp:matrix.org
Is there some way to have a pkgs.closureInfo that adds a drv as if you had done a substitution? Now if you ad a drv path it adds the entire build-time closure Why not unsafe discard? | 22:32:25 |
| 13 May 2024 |
|  zrsk joined the room. | 13:37:30 |
|  dariof4 joined the room. | 14:16:05 |
|  abbe joined the room. | 14:42:22 |
 mjm | lix is now in nixos-unstable, what's the best way to use it in a NixOS config? | 15:47:41 |
 K900 | nix.package = pkgs.lix | 15:47:54 |
| K900 | Probably | 15:47:58 |
| K900 | Or just keep using the module | 15:48:02 |
 puck | you can use nix.package = pkgs.lix; if you want; but using the overlay will guarantee more updates (tho less binary cache) | 15:48:44 |
| mjm | well, the module/overlay doesn't easily support using the one from nixpkgs | 15:48:44 |
| mjm | i do want more binary cache | 15:49:21 |
| mjm | yeah i guess i'll just do nix.package then | 15:50:43 |
| raitobezarius | to have binary cache and HEAD, we will probably need to track the channels and bolt a lix on there and rebuild with our own CI then push in our binary cache | 17:33:17 |
 Charles | What's lix using as its binary cache? Attic? | 17:34:36 |
| Arian left the room. | 17:37:44 |
 @tc424:glasgow.social | Last I heard they were using garage as the back end, and think about attic | 17:39:11 |
| @tc424:glasgow.social | I don't know if that means they're just pushing directly into garage's s3 interface for the moment | 17:39:36 |
| @tc424:glasgow.social | * Last I heard they were using garage as the back end, and thinking about attic | 17:39:57 |
| raitobezarius | In reply to @charles:computer.surgery
What's lix using as its binary cache? Attic? garage without attic | 17:41:16 |
