!9IQChSjwSHXPPWTa:lix.systems

Lix

1125 Members
Lix user channel. Feel free to discuss on-topic issues here and give each other help. For matrix.to links to the rest of the Lix channels, see: https://wiki.lix.systems/books/lix-organisation/page/matrix-rooms304 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
5 Feb 2026
@emma:rory.gayEmma [it/its]they dont (can check with -v)02:19:21
@coca162:matrix.orgCocaHm, that makes npins the only pinner that's concurrent then in the nix ecosystem then I think02:20:56
@coca162:matrix.orgCocaWeird nobody has done it before 02:21:17
@coca162:matrix.orgCoca* Hm, that makes npins the only pinner that's concurrent then in the nix ecosystem I think02:21:26
@sofiedotcafe:matrix.orgSofie 🏳️‍⚧️ (she/her)https://github.com/sofiedotcafe/luminarie/blob/068213a191113d3691f7c226e42bc3d360a6780c/hosts/tailstack/disko.nix17:20:14
@sofiedotcafe:matrix.orgSofie 🏳️‍⚧️ (she/her) module.tailstack.module.disko.null_resource.disko (remote-exec): + cryptsetup status crypt-dpool-hdd0
module.tailstack.module.disko.null_resource.disko (remote-exec): + cryptsetup open /dev/disk/by-partlabel/disk-hdd0-dpool crypt-dpool-hdd0 --key-file /dev/fd/63
module.tailstack.module.disko.null_resource.disko (remote-exec): ++ set +x
module.tailstack.module.disko.null_resource.disko (remote-exec): Device /dev/disk/by-partlabel/disk-hdd0-dpool does not exist or access denied.

│ Error: remote-exec provisioner error

│ with module.tailstack.module.disko.null_resource.disko,
│ on ../../modules/nixos_host/submodules/disko/main.tf line 14, in resource "null_resource" "disko":
│ 14: provisioner "remote-exec" {

│ error executing "/tmp/terraform_508773335.sh": Process exited with status 4
17:20:18
@sofiedotcafe:matrix.orgSofie 🏳️‍⚧️ (she/her)hmmmmm17:20:20
@sofiedotcafe:matrix.orgSofie 🏳️‍⚧️ (she/her)ah17:22:40
@sofiedotcafe:matrix.orgSofie 🏳️‍⚧️ (she/her)a state thing?17:22:43
@sofiedotcafe:matrix.orgSofie 🏳️‍⚧️ (she/her)yeah, it was it17:23:46
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusFeels like you got the channel wrong again17:26:45
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusHow can we avoid this reoccurring every time and now?17:26:58
@sofiedotcafe:matrix.orgSofie 🏳️‍⚧️ (she/her)ooppss17:27:51
@sofiedotcafe:matrix.orgSofie 🏳️‍⚧️ (she/her)i have to switch clients17:27:55
@sofiedotcafe:matrix.orgSofie 🏳️‍⚧️ (she/her)they look so same17:27:58
@sofiedotcafe:matrix.orgSofie 🏳️‍⚧️ (she/her)sorry17:28:00
@sofiedotcafe:matrix.orgSofie 🏳️‍⚧️ (she/her)really ;317:28:01
@neobrain:matrix.orgneobrainIs there any inherent reason that Lix doesn't indicate percentual progress when fetching flakes but instead only shows an absolute in-progress download size?20:42:41
13 May 2024
@aciceri:nixos.devzrsk joined the room.13:37:30
@dariof4:matrix.orgdariof4 joined the room.14:16:05
@abbe:badti.meabbe joined the room.14:42:22
@mjm:midna.devmjmlix is now in nixos-unstable, what's the best way to use it in a NixOS config?15:47:41
@k900:0upti.meK900nix.package = pkgs.lix15:47:54
@k900:0upti.meK900Probably15:47:58
@k900:0upti.meK900Or just keep using the module15:48:02
@puck:puck.moepuck you can use nix.package = pkgs.lix; if you want; but using the overlay will guarantee more updates (tho less binary cache) 15:48:44
@mjm:midna.devmjmwell, the module/overlay doesn't easily support using the one from nixpkgs15:48:44
@mjm:midna.devmjmi do want more binary cache15:49:21
@mjm:midna.devmjm yeah i guess i'll just do nix.package then 15:50:43
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusto have binary cache and HEAD, we will probably need to track the channels and bolt a lix on there and rebuild with our own CI then push in our binary cache17:33:17

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 10