| 2 Dec 2025 |
 xored | same error | 23:30:04 |
| xored | thanks a lot btw | 23:30:08 |
| xored | ohhh I can't read | 23:30:24 |
| xored | warning: Ignoring the client-specified setting 'pasta-path', because it is a restricted setting and you are not a trusted user | 23:30:31 |
| xored | guess we're rebuilding the host | 23:30:55 |
| xored | it's building, so it works without pasta, but you already knew that | 23:35:29 |
 leo60228 | just saw this cppnix pr from the other day, seems interesting? https://github.com/NixOS/nix/pull/14686 | 23:45:04 |
| leo60228 | haven't looked at the implementation but i like the idea of being able to attach metadata to store paths that don't affect the hash | 23:45:21 |
| leo60228 | (the idea is for auditability, i.e. getting more useful information about what software is installed on a machine than just a list of store paths) | 23:46:04 |
 raitobezarius | yup | 23:59:03 |
| raitobezarius | the concept of meta is not to affect the on-disk representation of drv, this PR seems to be going against all these invariants no matter what the new modulo algorithm become | 23:59:51 |
| 3 Dec 2025 |
| raitobezarius | auditability can already be achieved today by recording meta out-of-band like many projects does it, having a nicer way to do is definitely desireable, but i don't think this particular implementation would fly | 00:02:03 |
| 13 May 2024 |
|  zrsk joined the room. | 13:37:30 |
|  dariof4 joined the room. | 14:16:05 |
|  abbe joined the room. | 14:42:22 |
 mjm | lix is now in nixos-unstable, what's the best way to use it in a NixOS config? | 15:47:41 |
 K900 | nix.package = pkgs.lix | 15:47:54 |
| K900 | Probably | 15:47:58 |
| K900 | Or just keep using the module | 15:48:02 |
 puck | you can use nix.package = pkgs.lix; if you want; but using the overlay will guarantee more updates (tho less binary cache) | 15:48:44 |
| mjm | well, the module/overlay doesn't easily support using the one from nixpkgs | 15:48:44 |
| mjm | i do want more binary cache | 15:49:21 |
| mjm | yeah i guess i'll just do nix.package then | 15:50:43 |
| raitobezarius | to have binary cache and HEAD, we will probably need to track the channels and bolt a lix on there and rebuild with our own CI then push in our binary cache | 17:33:17 |
 Charles | What's lix using as its binary cache? Attic? | 17:34:36 |
|  Arian left the room. | 17:37:44 |
 @tc424:glasgow.social | Last I heard they were using garage as the back end, and think about attic | 17:39:11 |
| @tc424:glasgow.social | I don't know if that means they're just pushing directly into garage's s3 interface for the moment | 17:39:36 |
| @tc424:glasgow.social | * Last I heard they were using garage as the back end, and thinking about attic | 17:39:57 |
| raitobezarius | In reply to @charles:computer.surgery
What's lix using as its binary cache? Attic? garage without attic | 17:41:16 |
