| 16 Feb 2025 |
 antifuchs | “Fast nix” in German would be “almost nothing” vs “gar nix” being “entirely nothing” | 00:09:41 |
|  522 joined the room. | 00:24:30 |
 raitobezarius | In reply to @raitobezarius:matrix.org
There's a patch cooking https://gerrit.lix.systems/c/lix/+/2570 | 00:56:14 |
| antifuchs | samueldr: I made a few changes to your lix gha installer action (adding an option for extra nix config and a github access token); would you like a PR for that? | 03:17:02 |
| antifuchs | (also, thanks for that action, I'm slowly but surely yeeting all my cachix/install-nix-action usages from my projects) (: | 03:18:00 |
 samueldr | In reply to @antifuchs:asf.computer
samueldr: I made a few changes to your lix gha installer action (adding an option for extra nix config and a github access token); would you like a PR for that? please, at worst we'll have a few rounds of discussions about the details | 03:30:15 |
| antifuchs | Great! I’ll polish and file it tomorrow (: | 03:30:40 |
| samueldr | maybe file two, if I understand what you did | 03:31:04 |
| samueldr | antifuchs: thinking out loud, you don't need to do anything about it... I'll probably then import the support tooling to get the README updated with the options, automatically, as found here, now that there will be options https://github.com/samueldr/more-space-action/blob/latest/support/update-readme.rb | 03:33:56 |
| antifuchs | That’s a fantastic idea, I manually updated that but if there’s a script it’s even better | 03:39:16 |
| antifuchs | Also, yep, one pr per option sounds right | 03:41:00 |
 Charles | makeScopedPackagesFromDirectoryRecursive = newScope: directory:
nixpkgs.lib.customisation.makeScope newScope (scope:
nixpkgs.lib.filesystem.packagesFromDirectoryRecursive {
inherit directory;
callPackage = fn: args:
scope.callPackage
fn
(args // { sprinkle = self; });
}
);
not to interrupt but i have to share this extremely long function name i just wrote
| 03:41:49 |
| Charles | (oh darn the attribute set merge thingy does not do what i had hoped it would) | 03:53:37 |
| antifuchs | Hm, maybe you need to use withCallPackage or whatever it’s called | 03:54:14 |
| Charles | i was gonna go for builtins.functionArgs and doing it manually, but that sounds possibly better | 03:54:38 |
| antifuchs | nixpkgs.lib.callPackageWith, that’s the o e | 03:55:00 |
| antifuchs | * nixpkgs.lib.callPackageWith, that’s the one | 03:55:04 |
| * Charles RsTFM | 03:55:23 |
| antifuchs | I’m not sure it’s documented 😭 | 03:55:44 |
| Charles | https://nixos.org/manual/nixpkgs/unstable/#function-library-lib.customisation.callPackageWith ? | 03:56:13 |
| antifuchs | Hah, oops! There we go | 03:56:23 |
| raitobezarius | In reply to @charles:computer.surgery
i was gonna go for builtins.functionArgs and doing it manually, but that sounds possibly better This man is going to reinvent nixpkgs if left alone | 03:56:42 |
| Charles | yes | 03:56:51 |
| raitobezarius | 2muchinthefuture | 03:57:08 |
| Charles | in reality i'm just trying to make my dotfiles good | 03:57:34 |
| Charles | using my new sprinkles thingy | 03:58:00 |
| raitobezarius | Excited for the sprinkles RFC | 04:00:13 |
| Charles | i briefly considered trying to write a lix plugin that provided a builtins.newSprinkle function | 04:00:48 |
| Charles | also i'm not sure if callPackageWith fits the bill here because i need to combine it with the scope.callPackage too somehow | 04:03:01 |
| antifuchs | Ah, hmm, yeah that’s an issue | 04:06:29 |
