| 15 Feb 2025 |
 raitobezarius | In reply to @aloisw:julia0815.de
In fairness, this bug has not been fixed in Lix either as far as I know. There's a patch cooking | 13:40:45 |
 tea | sorry, meson noob here. is the lix that you get by just compile optimized? | 18:20:21 |
| tea | sorry, meson noob here. is the lix that you get by just compile o2 or o0? | 18:20:28 |
 aloisw | Depends on how you did the setup, but it should be 2 by default. | 18:29:42 |
 ShalokShalom | In reply to @s9616726:tu-dresden.de
for maximal confusion, call it minix Linix đ | 18:39:29 |
 helle (just a stray cat girl) | In reply to @s9616726:tu-dresden.de
for maximal confusion, call it minix nah, just call it echtnix (anyway, silly dutch humor) | 21:44:25 |
 piegames | We already have the garnix CI ⌠| 21:49:27 |
 Arian | fastnix is also a good one | 22:24:18 |
| Arian | Synonym for garnix but it's faster | 22:24:26 |
| 16 Feb 2025 |
 antifuchs | âFast nixâ in German would be âalmost nothingâ vs âgar nixâ being âentirely nothingâ | 00:09:41 |
|  522 joined the room. | 00:24:30 |
| raitobezarius | In reply to @raitobezarius:matrix.org
There's a patch cooking https://gerrit.lix.systems/c/lix/+/2570 | 00:56:14 |
| antifuchs | samueldr: I made a few changes to your lix gha installer action (adding an option for extra nix config and a github access token); would you like a PR for that? | 03:17:02 |
| antifuchs | (also, thanks for that action, I'm slowly but surely yeeting all my cachix/install-nix-action usages from my projects) (: | 03:18:00 |
 samueldr | In reply to @antifuchs:asf.computer
samueldr: I made a few changes to your lix gha installer action (adding an option for extra nix config and a github access token); would you like a PR for that? please, at worst we'll have a few rounds of discussions about the details | 03:30:15 |
| antifuchs | Great! Iâll polish and file it tomorrow (: | 03:30:40 |
| samueldr | maybe file two, if I understand what you did | 03:31:04 |
| samueldr | antifuchs: thinking out loud, you don't need to do anything about it... I'll probably then import the support tooling to get the README updated with the options, automatically, as found here, now that there will be options https://github.com/samueldr/more-space-action/blob/latest/support/update-readme.rb | 03:33:56 |
| antifuchs | Thatâs a fantastic idea, I manually updated that but if thereâs a script itâs even better | 03:39:16 |
| antifuchs | Also, yep, one pr per option sounds right | 03:41:00 |
 Charles | makeScopedPackagesFromDirectoryRecursive = newScope: directory:
nixpkgs.lib.customisation.makeScope newScope (scope:
nixpkgs.lib.filesystem.packagesFromDirectoryRecursive {
inherit directory;
callPackage = fn: args:
scope.callPackage
fn
(args // { sprinkle = self; });
}
);
not to interrupt but i have to share this extremely long function name i just wrote
| 03:41:49 |
| Charles | (oh darn the attribute set merge thingy does not do what i had hoped it would) | 03:53:37 |
| antifuchs | Hm, maybe you need to use withCallPackage or whatever itâs called | 03:54:14 |
| Charles | i was gonna go for builtins.functionArgs and doing it manually, but that sounds possibly better | 03:54:38 |
| antifuchs | nixpkgs.lib.callPackageWith, thatâs the o e | 03:55:00 |
