!9IQChSjwSHXPPWTa:lix.systems

Lix

807 Members
Lix user channel. Feel free to discuss on-topic issues here and give each other help. For matrix.to links to the rest of the Lix channels, see: https://wiki.lix.systems/books/lix-organisation/page/matrix-rooms235 Servers

You have reached the beginning of time (for this room).


SenderMessageTime
15 Feb 2025
@benjb83:matrix.orgBenjB83 joined the room.10:18:02
@benjb83:matrix.orgBenjB83 changed their display name from Benjamín Buske to BenjB83.10:43:15
@piegames:flausch.socialpiegames
In reply to @charles:computer.surgery
Project idea: nix minifier
I think nixfmt can already do that
10:56:03
@s9616726:tu-dresden.deMaximilian Marx for maximal confusion, call it minix 11:03:49
@piegames:flausch.socialpiegamesOr it at least has the infrastructure to trivially implement, because it has other IR transformations already10:56:45
@piegames:flausch.socialpiegames
In reply to @kfears:matrix.org
Lix has also been backporting stuff from newer versions like 2.24, like pipe-operator, so as far as normal or even advanced usage (going as far as maintaining Nixpkgs) is concerned, you should be good to go
Bad example, pipe operator was implemented first in Lix and then independently in CppNix (they have different semantics)
10:58:36
@kfears:matrix.orgKFears (no longer human)
In reply to @piegames:flausch.social
Bad example, pipe operator was implemented first in Lix and then independently in CppNix (they have different semantics)
Wut
11:19:33
@kfears:matrix.orgKFears (no longer human)Tell me more?11:20:31
@piegames:flausch.socialpiegamesDifferent precedence for the backpipe operator11:45:26
@piegames:flausch.socialpiegamesTry it out :)11:45:33
@kfears:matrix.orgKFears (no longer human)🫠13:27:23
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius
In reply to @aloisw:julia0815.de
In fairness, this bug has not been fixed in Lix either as far as I know.
There's a patch cooking
13:40:45
@noob_tea:matrix.orgtea sorry, meson noob here. is the lix that you get by just compile optimized? 18:20:21
@noob_tea:matrix.orgtea sorry, meson noob here. is the lix that you get by just compile o2 or o0? 18:20:28
@aloisw:julia0815.dealoiswDepends on how you did the setup, but it should be 2 by default.18:29:42
@shalokshalom:kde.orgShalokShalom
In reply to @s9616726:tu-dresden.de
for maximal confusion, call it minix
Linix 😜
18:39:29
@helle:tacobelllabs.nethelle (just a stray cat girl)
In reply to @s9616726:tu-dresden.de
for maximal confusion, call it minix
nah, just call it echtnix (anyway, silly dutch humor)
21:44:25
@piegames:flausch.socialpiegamesWe already have the garnix CI …21:49:27
@arianvp:matrix.orgArianfastnix is also a good one22:24:18
@arianvp:matrix.orgArianSynonym for garnix but it's faster22:24:26
16 Feb 2025
@antifuchs:asf.computerantifuchs“Fast nix” in German would be “almost nothing” vs “gar nix” being “entirely nothing”00:09:41
@r522:matrix.org522 joined the room.00:24:30
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius
In reply to @raitobezarius:matrix.org
There's a patch cooking
https://gerrit.lix.systems/c/lix/+/2570
00:56:14
@antifuchs:asf.computerantifuchs samueldr: I made a few changes to your lix gha installer action (adding an option for extra nix config and a github access token); would you like a PR for that? 03:17:02
@antifuchs:asf.computerantifuchs(also, thanks for that action, I'm slowly but surely yeeting all my cachix/install-nix-action usages from my projects) (:03:18:00
@samueldr:matrix.orgsamueldr
In reply to @antifuchs:asf.computer
samueldr: I made a few changes to your lix gha installer action (adding an option for extra nix config and a github access token); would you like a PR for that?
please, at worst we'll have a few rounds of discussions about the details
03:30:15
@antifuchs:asf.computerantifuchsGreat! I’ll polish and file it tomorrow (:03:30:40

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 10