| 30 Nov 2025 |
 Blastboom Strice | Did you try putting it like this:
```nix
Text
``` | 18:20:48 |
 Aijokey | I'm not good with matrix or markdown(?) | 18:21:38 |
| Blastboom Strice | (Its a mix of both, cuz matrix clients use markdown, but might use slightly different implementations) | 18:22:15 |
 Acid Bong | code blocks are the same, only lists, newlines and single `mono phrases` vary | 18:23:58 |
| Acid Bong | anyway
do pipe operator implementations vary between Nix and Lix? i'm using Nix for everything on my system, but build my NixOS with Lix just for the sake of multiline output, and I don't wanna mess up with my (and/or someone else's) code | 18:26:08 |
 WeetHet | I think the behaviour should be somewhat the same but the feature names are different | 18:26:59 |
| Acid Bong | aha, Lix has no <| | 18:32:30 |
 piegames | In reply to @acidbong:envs.net
anyway
do pipe operator implementations vary between Nix and Lix? i'm using Nix for everything on my system, but build my NixOS with Lix just for the sake of multiline output, and I don't wanna mess up with my (and/or someone else's) code Only in operator precedence, but this should be of little to no practical relevance | 18:32:50 |
|  @rainbowcat:xmr.se left the room. | 18:36:53 |
| Acid Bong | understandable, i guess i'll abstain from it (lib.pipe is already familiar for me) | 18:44:11 |
 raitobezarius | In reply to @weethet:catgirl.cloud
Also I thought that both flakes and nix3 CLI were gonna be moved to a separate module? Not nix3 CLI | 18:47:01 |
| raitobezarius | Flakes yes | 18:47:04 |
| raitobezarius | It's going to be very very progressive | 18:47:12 |
| raitobezarius | (and yes this means that plugins will gain the ability to extend the REPL) | 18:49:52 |
| raitobezarius | (or the nix3 CLI itself) | 18:50:03 |
| WeetHet | How would nix3 cli function without flakes? | 18:53:41 |
 niklaskorz | if you specify a file with -f it works on normal nix files instead of flakes | 19:02:06 |
