| 11 Mar 2024 |
 @mangoiv.:matrix.org | https://discourse.nixos.org/t/nixos-foundation-board-open-board-meeting-2024-03-20/41209?u=mangoiv | 21:37:21 |
 joepie91 🏳️🌈 | In reply to @patka_123:matrix.org
Can you post here for example: https://discourse.nixos.org/t/nixcon-na-2024-is-getting-sponsored-by-anduril-what-to-do-about-it/41258/4
Or does it also say "Please wait an hour between posts in this topic"? if we're going to do feature testing it is probably best done in a testing thread, to avoid pollution and distraction | 21:37:25 |
| @mangoiv.:matrix.org | For people who didn’t see it in the foundation channel | 21:37:30 |
 tomberek | This channel is to discuss a policy that we should adopt.
If there are specific questions, I can answer them (please do so in a thread so it is easier to track the flow of the discussion, and allow the original people to participate in that thread without piling in too much). | 21:37:51 |
| joepie91 🏳️🌈 | In reply to @shalokshalom:dendrite.matrix.org
How is the usage of the software less critical as the support of it? I think both are bad, and I suspect that quite a few others feel so too, but that is a problem with a much harder solution | 21:38:04 |
 @patka_123:matrix.org | In reply to @joepie91:pixie.town
if we're going to do feature testing it is probably best done in a testing thread, to avoid pollution and distraction Just wondering if you see an input box and not that message I sent earlier | 21:37:58 |
| @patka_123:matrix.org | Don't have to type in there | 21:38:06 |
 @piegames:matrix.org | In reply to @patka_123:matrix.org
Can you post here for example: https://discourse.nixos.org/t/nixcon-na-2024-is-getting-sponsored-by-anduril-what-to-do-about-it/41258/4
Or does it also say "Please wait an hour between posts in this topic"? Yes it always says that as long as the feature is active. I think the check only happens while actually posting? Also, likes definitely shouldn't count to that | 21:38:07 |
| joepie91 🏳️🌈 | In reply to @patka_123:matrix.org
Just wondering if you see an input box and not that message I sent earlier oh right. if I hit Reply I get an input box yes | 21:38:35 |
 rhelmot | I think GitHub is probably our best bet for a platform to publish a statement on this issue for linkage and signatures | 21:38:55 |
| joepie91 🏳️🌈 | tomberek: note that many people cannot use threads either due to client support or cognitive incompatibilities | 21:39:10 |
| @patka_123:matrix.org | Turns out I'm just a big dummy. Nevermind. Sorry for the false alarm :P | 21:39:09 |
| joepie91 🏳️🌈 | * tomberek: note that many people cannot use threads on Matrix either due to client support or cognitive incompatibilities | 21:39:19 |
| rhelmot | Would anyone like to volunteer to write an initial draft of a statement and/or host it under their namespace? I would offer but I am very new to this community and worry about optics | 21:40:25 |
| joepie91 🏳️🌈 | rhelmot: what sort of statement are you thinking of? | 21:41:14 |
| rhelmot | Something to summarize the community consensus and collect signatures in support of “do not do this” | 21:41:45 |
 Shalok Shalom | Do we talk about a statement about how the conclusion formed, to accept the second sponsorship, or a statement of the community, that we disagree with it? | 21:41:55 |
| Shalok Shalom | Ah, yeah. | 21:42:04 |
| joepie91 🏳️🌈 | rhelmot: would the intended recipient of this statement be the Foundation, the internet at large, something else? | 21:42:30 |
| Shalok Shalom | I think we should include the reasoning for the why as well, cause I still dont know that as an example and I have failed to read that in the above discussion | 21:42:38 |
| Shalok Shalom | or anywhere else, really. | 21:42:43 |
| rhelmot | I think the board members who have the ability to reverse the decision | 21:42:50 |
| Shalok Shalom | I think the write up could also include that exact sum and implications that is being sponsored | 21:43:45 |
| Shalok Shalom | So that people can form an informed opinion. | 21:43:52 |
| rhelmot | Yep | 21:44:00 |
| rhelmot |
- statement of facts
- ethical concerns
- statement of purpose
| 21:44:24 |
| Shalok Shalom | * I think the write up could also include that exact sum and implications on what is being sponsored | 21:44:34 |
| joepie91 🏳️🌈 | I think a signatory letter to the board would be a viable idea. I'm more cautious about an open letter; this is a complex subject, where the majority of people is unlikely to have a lot of background understanding of the topic, and that means that if you try to basically play the numbers game, that can very easily backfire | 21:44:58 |
| joepie91 🏳️🌈 | because we can do our best to explain the problem, but there is still only so much that you can get across in a few paragraphs | 21:45:27 |
| joepie91 🏳️🌈 | I think we can expect board members to take the time to understand the topic, with the letter as a guide; but that same expectation does not really fly for, say, random redditors | 21:46:01 |
