!BgJZHVOYkwVcEKLAyM:nixos.org

NixOS Deployments

1216 Members
NixOS Deployment tooling304 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
19 Sep 2025
@goodboy:matrix.orglord_fomohttps://nixops.dev/manual/development/19:22:50
@goodboy:matrix.orglord_fomooof19:23:14
@k900:0upti.meK900 I personally don't think it's that interesting, there's just too much critical mass behind Terraform/OpenTofu and nixops4 doesn't significantly improve on that model 19:24:27
@goodboy:matrix.orglord_fomowell having come from that space years ago, i can claim that terraform is not a great solution if you actually scale to large clusters19:25:06
@goodboy:matrix.orglord_fomosaltstack / ansible would be much better solutions19:25:16
@goodboy:matrix.orglord_fomobut i guess i was kinda of hoping for a next-gen soln coming from nixland19:25:29
@k900:0upti.meK900 Those don't solve the same problem 19:25:42
@goodboy:matrix.orglord_fomopretty sure they do19:25:53
@goodboy:matrix.orglord_fomobut maybe things changed19:26:00
@goodboy:matrix.orglord_fomoi also know people workin in devops that would verify those claims pretty sure19:26:14
@k900:0upti.meK900Terraform is not in the same class of thing as Ansible, and it never was19:26:18
@goodboy:matrix.orglord_fomosure, then salt19:26:28
@goodboy:matrix.orglord_fomoi wouldn't use ansible anyway over salt19:26:35
@goodboy:matrix.orglord_fomoor openstack19:26:39
@k900:0upti.meK900 Salt and Ansible are roughly in the same class of thing 19:26:40
@k900:0upti.meK900 Which Terraform is not 19:26:44
@k900:0upti.meK900 Openstack is in yet another class of thing that is neither of those two 19:26:56
@goodboy:matrix.orglord_fomowell i know for a fact you can full-lifecycle deploy on salt bc i patched it for that years ago19:27:10
@k900:0upti.meK900 "Full lifecycle" as in "deploy an image and then customize it later", sure 19:27:59
@goodboy:matrix.orglord_fomoon the vmware backend actually of all things, before they were acquired 😂19:27:59
@k900:0upti.meK900 You can also do that with Terraform + any NixOS deployment tool 19:28:14
@goodboy:matrix.orglord_fomoi mean go from no host to full host19:28:23
@goodboy:matrix.orglord_fomopresuming some distributed runtime bootstrapping19:28:37
@k900:0upti.meK900 You're generally not going to do better on a public cloud, at least currently 19:29:32
@k900:0upti.meK900 And trying to pretend that the two steps are actually the same step doesn't help 19:29:36
@goodboy:matrix.orglord_fomoanyway, i'm slightly surprised you wouldn't be more bullish on a nixland approach actually19:29:37
@goodboy:matrix.orglord_fomoto me that's like the whole end goal of everything i'd think nix is trying to do?19:29:54
@goodboy:matrix.orglord_fomo
In reply to @k900:0upti.me
You're generally not going to do better on a public cloud, at least currently
fair
19:30:04
@k900:0upti.meK900I think a "nixland approach" at this point requires cooperation from the control plane19:30:13
@k900:0upti.meK900 And such a control plane can absolutely exist 19:30:20

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6