| 11 Jun 2021 |
dongcarl | * Oh I see... the execute bit of parent directories strike again! | 17:45:02 |
teto | I wish I didn have to resort to ioohk's flake but after failing myself, I caved in and managed to get nixops + libvirtd plugin via nix build --impure --expr '(builtins.getFlake "github:input-output-hk/nixops-flake")'\ ~ '.impure.${builtins.currentSystem}.nixops_2_0-latest-unstable [ "virtd" ]' (for posterity) | 21:13:56 |
baloo | is there an integration between nixops and nix integration tests? | 23:20:35 |
baloo | huum, came out weird | 23:21:13 |
baloo | I probably should just put the tests I care about in a overlay, and not try to integrate it in nixops | 23:22:02 |
| 13 Jun 2021 |
| CRTified joined the room. | 00:17:41 |
| garionion joined the room. | 18:15:28 |
| 14 Jun 2021 |
| tilpner joined the room. | 10:35:15 |
| Dandellion changed their profile picture. | 14:48:23 |
| aaronjanse joined the room. | 22:23:00 |
| 15 Jun 2021 |
| tianyi joined the room. | 06:15:18 |
| tianyi changed their display name from tianyi to Tianyi Wang. | 07:09:04 |
| * Robert Hensing (roberth) wrote a nixops PR giving resources full access to the node configs. It's useful for deriving security groups (ec2 'firewall') and probably more DRY goodness. https://github.com/NixOS/nixops/pull/1456 | 16:16:38 |
Robert Hensing (roberth) | who could review it? adisbladis maybe? | 16:17:10 |
| tianyi changed their display name from Tianyi Wang to tianyi. | 22:15:07 |
| 16 Jun 2021 |
@grahamc:nixos.org | srhb: heya, so this issue and comment really chains me pretty often: https://github.com/DBCDK/morph/issues/99#issuecomment-748550792 could we talk sometime about designing a solution that DBCDK would accept? | 17:59:11 |
| tollb1 joined the room. | 18:31:25 |
srhb | In reply to @grahamc:nixos.org srhb: heya, so this issue and comment really chains me pretty often: https://github.com/DBCDK/morph/issues/99#issuecomment-748550792 could we talk sometime about designing a solution that DBCDK would accept? Yes, definitely. :) It's very late here now so I can try to catch you (and others?) tomorrow sometime. | 22:25:24 |
@grahamc:nixos.org | cool, ping me when you can :) | 22:25:40 |
| 17 Jun 2021 |
tilpner | error: a 'x86_64-linux' with features {} is required to build '/nix/store/wrbaxpdn7dpqvs4wim01154bih0jxc62-builder.pl.drv', but I am a 'aarch64-linux' with features {benchmark, big-parallel, gccarch-armv8-a, kvm, nixos-test}
I don't suppose anyone has anyone encountered something similar recently, and tracked it to a nixpkgs change? (Unlikely, probably my fault)
| 10:06:38 |
tilpner | That's the buildenv builder, and I have no idea how it snuck in as x86, seeing as how I don't remember changing anything since this last worked. | 10:07:36 |
mvnetbiz | I had the same error just doing a buildFHSUserEnv with nothing in it on aarch64 | 10:15:58 |
tilpner | Ah, I found it. My nixpkgs reimport-with-different-options mechanism apparently wasn't tested well enough with cross-arch deployments :( | 10:19:20 |
tilpner | * Ah, I found it. My nixpkgs reimport-with-different-options mechanism apparently wasn't tested well enough with cross-arch deployments :(
(Sorry for the noise) | 10:22:53 |
srhb | In reply to @grahamc:nixos.org cool, ping me when you can :) I think the best course of action is to make the time-of-upload especially wrt activation (eg. boot --reboot) configurable per secret. I think that should satisfy everyone? | 10:59:49 |
@grahamc:nixos.org | cc hexa | 11:00:54 |
@grahamc:nixos.org | so maybe a trinary pre-activation | post-activation | always ? | 11:03:42 |
@grahamc:nixos.org | * so maybe an enum, pre-activation | post-activation? | 11:05:13 |
@grahamc:nixos.org | (4.5h of sleep...) | 11:05:20 |
srhb | Ouch, sorry to hear that! Yes, something like that. The weird thing is that most permutations of switching are probably aleady doing "post-activation", and I'm afraid it's become a bit of a grandfathered-in behaviour. | 11:08:44 |