!BgJZHVOYkwVcEKLAyM:nixos.org

NixOS Deployments

1263 Members
NixOS Deployment tooling309 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
11 Jun 2021
@dongcarl:matrix.orgdongcarl * Oh I see... the execute bit of parent directories strike again!17:45:02
@keiichi:matrix.orgteto I wish I didn have to resort to ioohk's flake but after failing myself, I caved in and managed to get nixops + libvirtd plugin via nix build --impure --expr '(builtins.getFlake "github:input-output-hk/nixops-flake")'\ ~ '.impure.${builtins.currentSystem}.nixops_2_0-latest-unstable [ "virtd" ]' (for posterity) 21:13:56
@baloo_:matrix.orgbaloois there an integration between nixops and nix integration tests?23:20:35
@baloo_:matrix.orgbaloohuum, came out weird23:21:13
@baloo_:matrix.orgbalooI probably should just put the tests I care about in a overlay, and not try to integrate it in nixops23:22:02
13 Jun 2021
@schnecfk:ruhr-uni-bochum.deCRTified joined the room.00:17:41
@garionion:entr0py.degarionion joined the room.18:15:28
14 Jun 2021
@tilpner:tx0.cotilpner joined the room.10:35:15
@dandellion:dodsorf.asDandellion changed their profile picture.14:48:23
@aaronjanse:matrix.orgaaronjanse joined the room.22:23:00
15 Jun 2021
@tianyi:superkazuya.comtianyi joined the room.06:15:18
@tianyi:superkazuya.comtianyi changed their display name from tianyi to Tianyi Wang.07:09:04
* @roberthensing:matrix.orgRobert Hensing (roberth) wrote a nixops PR giving resources full access to the node configs. It's useful for deriving security groups (ec2 'firewall') and probably more DRY goodness. https://github.com/NixOS/nixops/pull/145616:16:38
@roberthensing:matrix.orgRobert Hensing (roberth) who could review it? adisbladis maybe? 16:17:10
@tianyi:superkazuya.comtianyi changed their display name from Tianyi Wang to tianyi.22:15:07
16 Jun 2021
@grahamc:nixos.org@grahamc:nixos.org srhb: heya, so this issue and comment really chains me pretty often: https://github.com/DBCDK/morph/issues/99#issuecomment-748550792 could we talk sometime about designing a solution that DBCDK would accept? 17:59:11
@tollb1:matrix.orgtollb1 joined the room.18:31:25
@srhb:matrix.orgsrhb
In reply to @grahamc:nixos.org
srhb: heya, so this issue and comment really chains me pretty often: https://github.com/DBCDK/morph/issues/99#issuecomment-748550792 could we talk sometime about designing a solution that DBCDK would accept?
Yes, definitely. :) It's very late here now so I can try to catch you (and others?) tomorrow sometime.
22:25:24
@grahamc:nixos.org@grahamc:nixos.orgcool, ping me when you can :)22:25:40
17 Jun 2021
@tilpner:tx0.cotilpner

error: a 'x86_64-linux' with features {} is required to build '/nix/store/wrbaxpdn7dpqvs4wim01154bih0jxc62-builder.pl.drv', but I am a 'aarch64-linux' with features {benchmark, big-parallel, gccarch-armv8-a, kvm, nixos-test}

I don't suppose anyone has anyone encountered something similar recently, and tracked it to a nixpkgs change? (Unlikely, probably my fault)

10:06:38
@tilpner:tx0.cotilpnerThat's the buildenv builder, and I have no idea how it snuck in as x86, seeing as how I don't remember changing anything since this last worked.10:07:36
@mvtva:matrix.orgmvnetbizI had the same error just doing a buildFHSUserEnv with nothing in it on aarch6410:15:58
@tilpner:tx0.cotilpnerAh, I found it. My nixpkgs reimport-with-different-options mechanism apparently wasn't tested well enough with cross-arch deployments :(10:19:20
@tilpner:tx0.cotilpner * Ah, I found it. My nixpkgs reimport-with-different-options mechanism apparently wasn't tested well enough with cross-arch deployments :( (Sorry for the noise)10:22:53
@srhb:matrix.orgsrhb
In reply to @grahamc:nixos.org
cool, ping me when you can :)
I think the best course of action is to make the time-of-upload especially wrt activation (eg. boot --reboot) configurable per secret. I think that should satisfy everyone?
10:59:49
@grahamc:nixos.org@grahamc:nixos.org cc hexa 11:00:54
@grahamc:nixos.org@grahamc:nixos.orgso maybe a trinary pre-activation | post-activation | always ?11:03:42
@grahamc:nixos.org@grahamc:nixos.org * so maybe an enum, pre-activation | post-activation?11:05:13
@grahamc:nixos.org@grahamc:nixos.org(4.5h of sleep...)11:05:20
@srhb:matrix.orgsrhbOuch, sorry to hear that! Yes, something like that. The weird thing is that most permutations of switching are probably aleady doing "post-activation", and I'm afraid it's become a bit of a grandfathered-in behaviour.11:08:44

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6