| 23 Mar 2025 |
 K900 | You can use terranix if you don't want to write HCL | 16:36:06 |
 emily | you can use agenix for secrets | 16:36:43 |
 @dmjio:matrix.org | we could just rewrite nixops in haskell | 16:37:17 |
| K900 | You can go talk to @Robert Hensing (roberth) for that | 16:37:26 |
| K900 | He's already rewriting it | 16:37:29 |
| emily | https://github.com/nixops4/nixops4 | 16:37:41 |
| @dmjio:matrix.org | if its ready I'll use it, but is it at feature parity | 16:37:56 |
| emily | how can you say "we could just rewrite nixops" but also not use/contribute to something if it's not at feature parity? | 16:38:12 |
