!CJXQiUGqNPcFonEdME:nixos.org

NixOS Foundation

452 Members
Public room for chatting with the NixOS Foundation Board113 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
16 Nov 2023
@kranzes:matrix.orgIlan Joselevich (Kranzes)They're probably under the same project 19:53:43
@kranzes:matrix.orgIlan Joselevich (Kranzes)It's best to ask @DavHau for confirmation though 19:54:17
@kranzes:matrix.orgIlan Joselevich (Kranzes)How many of those listed are actually tied to each other 19:56:14
@kranzes:matrix.orgIlan Joselevich (Kranzes)For example, 19:56:50
@kranzes:matrix.orgIlan Joselevich (Kranzes)Screenshot_20231116-195632_Mull.png
Download Screenshot_20231116-195632_Mull.png
19:56:54
@julienmalka:matrix.orgJulien I don’t think technology bias is a problem for founds that aim to create « next generation internet » or basically focus on innovative technology. It’s fine for them to say « we believe that the functional software deployment model is the future and we want to invest in it ». The tone of the article in a bit like if the author thinks that because it’s public money, nlnet has to balance their money between the different approach to package management, which I don’t think it true. They also imply that unbalanced repartition of the grants constitute a conflict of interest, which I also don’t think is true. The only fair point I think is that if nlnet has a technology bias — which I think is fair to say they have, Michiel himself has told me « we are following Nix since its beginning, Eelco’s thesis happened to land on my desk just after he wrote it » — they should probably publicly disclose it and justify it. 20:30:24
@julienmalka:matrix.orgJulien* I don’t think technology bias is a problem for founds that aim to create « next generation internet » or basically focus on innovative technology. It’s fine for them to say « we believe that the functional software deployment model is the future and we want to invest in it ». The tone of the article in a bit like if the author thinks that because it’s public money, nlnet has to balance their money between the different approach to package management, which I don’t think is true. They also imply that unbalanced repartition of the grants constitute a conflict of interest, which I also don’t think is true. The only fair point I think is that if nlnet has a technology bias — which I think is fair to say they have, Michiel himself has told me « we are following Nix since its beginning, Eelco’s thesis happened to land on my desk just after he wrote it » — they should probably publicly disclose it and justify it.20:31:05
@julienmalka:matrix.orgJulienI would think a bigger reason to worry would be if some nlnet found would start to use a major part of their grant money to found only functional package managers and cease to found other innovative technology in other sectors. But to make strategic decisions of technology to bet on, for each sector, is kinda what they’re paid for20:34:09
@julienmalka:matrix.orgJulienStill, I understand that when you’re a arch developer receive « just use nix » as an answer is kinda harsh20:35:29
@arianvp:matrix.orgArianAlso when you acknowledge that the arch wiki is the next NixOS documentation out there x)20:36:40
@julienmalka:matrix.orgJulien Which is also strange because when I asked clarifications about certains nlnet decisions I received clear and well argued rationals from nlnet 20:37:08
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariuss/found/fund20:40:32
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusMy fellow Frenchie :-)20:40:48
@julienmalka:matrix.orgJulien Who are you ? 20:42:44
@julienmalka:matrix.orgJulienTexting while walking is also not helping20:43:07
@kranzes:matrix.orgIlan Joselevich (Kranzes)
In reply to @julienmalka:matrix.org
Texting while walking is also not helping
Have you considered not complicating it by using weird ascii characters?
20:43:56
@kranzes:matrix.orgIlan Joselevich (Kranzes)🤣20:44:08
@julienmalka:matrix.orgJulienIf I chose the easy path I wouldn’t be here20:44:51
@julienmalka:matrix.orgJulien I would be an arch linux developer 20:45:11
@julienmalka:matrix.orgJulien(Sorry joking no offense)20:45:25
17 Nov 2023
@me:xinyang.lifeXinyang ⚡️ left the room.02:35:55
18 Nov 2023
@imincik:matrix.orgIvan Mincik (imincik) joined the room.21:31:24
21 Nov 2023
@niksnut:matrix.orgEelco changed their display name from niksnut to Eelco.16:37:40
22 Nov 2023
@heisfer:matrix.orgHeisfer joined the room.09:41:30
@heisfer:matrix.orgHeisfer changed their display name from heisfer to Heisfer.09:43:36
@heisfer:matrix.orgHeisfer set a profile picture.09:55:25
24 Nov 2023
@mikects:matrix.org@mikects:matrix.org left the room.12:46:51
25 Nov 2023
@mektov:mtx.ohs.cxmektov joined the room.17:27:50
26 Nov 2023
@rdobre:matrix.orgrdobre joined the room.21:10:19
29 Nov 2023
@delroth:delroth.netdelroth joined the room.12:57:48

There are no newer messages yet.


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 10