| 12 May 2024 |
 nat-418 | * The problem was the category of "vouched" itself being unclear. A nomination process would have avoided this whole issue. I fully understand Lunaphied's concerns but I think the reality is that the application format had a design flaw that infinisil innocently stumbled on. I think we can acknowledge this as a bug in the process without questioning Silvain's good faith. | 10:54:38 |
 ronef | Morning
In an aim to further assure folks.
That section is indeed unclear and the presence of Board Members being on or off that list won't be meaningful for the appointment process. I believe it had an initial intention to potentially serve as a "reference call" of sorts, which we might not have time for regardless.
And therefore if I'm on a list, I will not use myself as a reference call. | 11:56:28 |
 lassulus | hmm, I also send in an application yesterday, but it didn't show up in the stream yet, is there a pre filtering happening or is my mail stuck somewhere? :D | 15:28:11 |
 @theophane:hufschmitt.net | In reply to @lassulus:lassul.us
hmm, I also send in an application yesterday, but it didn't show up in the stream yet, is there a pre filtering happening or is my mail stuck somewhere? :D Apparently yes, a filter called GMail spam filter 😬 | 15:33:30 |
| lassulus | oh noes, yeah gmail sometimes doesn't like my mailserver | 15:33:46 |
| @theophane:hufschmitt.net | Sorry about that, I'll publish your application and make sure I check my spams again in case others arrive | 15:33:59 |
| lassulus | thanks! | 15:34:05 |
| @theophane:hufschmitt.net | Done, https://nixpkgs.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/436732-Constitutional-assembly-applications/topic/Lassulus | 15:36:24 |
 hexa | the 3rd and fourth link are broken and go back to the zulip? | 15:37:47 |
| lassulus | weird | 15:38:17 |
