| 9 May 2024 |
 Sigmanificient | Hello, could it be possible to add a label for orphaned package adoption on nixpkgs?
This could be helpful for reviewers, as there are often easy to merge and it would reduce the wait time for the pr authors. | 17:10:32 |
| Sigmanificient | * Hello, could it be possible to add a label for orphaned package adoption on nixpkgs?
This could be helpful for reviewers, as there are often easy to merge and it would reduce the wait time for the pr authors.
I made an issue about it on nixpkgs: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/310364 | 17:10:51 |
|  @halfbit:matrix.org joined the room. | 18:40:27 |
 Artturin | In reply to @sigmanificient:matrix.org
Hello, could it be possible to add a label for orphaned package adoption on nixpkgs?
This could be helpful for reviewers, as there are often easy to merge and it would reduce the wait time for the pr authors.
I made an issue about it on nixpkgs: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/310364 Nixpkgs labels are not controlled by the foundation | 19:17:17 |
| Sigmanificient | In reply to @artturin:matrix.org
Nixpkgs labels are not controlled by the foundation Is there a matrix room where it should be posted? | 20:19:33 |
 Winter | In reply to @sigmanificient:matrix.org
Is there a matrix room where it should be posted? #dev:nixos.org | 20:52:15 |
 @emma:rory.gay | matrix:r/dev:nixos.org | 20:52:33 |
| @emma:rory.gay | there, that's at least clickable | 20:52:39 |
 hexa | probably depends on your client, but both work for me | 20:57:15 |
| @emma:rory.gay | yeah Element renders them as pills even if its just plaintext, almost no other client does so | 20:58:57 |
|  BrainBlur joined the room. | 23:39:23 |
| 10 May 2024 |
| BrainBlur changed their display name from Kiran Hegde to BrainBlur. | 01:33:36 |
 aleksana 🏳️⚧️ (force me to bed after 18:00 UTC) | https://matrix.to/#/#dev:nixos.org | 07:48:52 |
| aleksana 🏳️⚧️ (force me to bed after 18:00 UTC) | Definitely a clickable link | 07:49:09 |
 nat-418 | Does anyone know if the Foundation / project has recieved funds donated via Benevity?
https://benevity.com | 10:23:22 |
| hexa | https://causes.benevity.org/causes/528-5623118983260_fc2f | 10:32:19 |
| hexa | * https://causes.benevity.org/causes/528-5623118983260_fc2f apparently we registered at some point, and this question has come up before and I'm not sure it was answered | 10:34:19 |
 Eelco | Yeah we're registered | 11:22:42 |
 Janik (they/them) | In reply to @niksnut:matrix.org
Yeah we're registered Did we receive funds? | 11:24:49 |
| Eelco | Not sure, donations from the UK Online Giving Foundation may go through Benevity | 11:29:55 |
| Janik (they/them) | Can you check? The email on the benevity page suggests that you have access to the account. | 11:30:51 |
| Eelco | Yes those donations go through Benevity | 12:08:41 |
| Janik (they/them) | Did you check if we actually received funds? 🙈 | 12:10:36 |
| Eelco | yes | 12:11:19 |
| Janik (they/them) | sorry can you be a bit more verbose, do you mean yes we received funds or yes you checked, that's a important difference. | 12:14:14 |
| Eelco | yes I checked and yes we received | 12:16:00 |
 raitobezarius | My understanding is that folks are interested to understand if, in the following report https://discourse.nixos.org/t/nixos-foundation-financial-summary-a-transparent-look-into-2023/43640, are those funds counted there under company donations or personal donations? Given that they are technically third-party donations via the Benevity proxy | 12:19:33 |
|  fpletz joined the room. | 12:43:54 |
| Winter changed their display name from Winter to Winter (test). | 13:34:02 |
| Winter changed their display name from Winter (test) to Winter. | 13:34:28 |
