| 1 May 2024 |
infinisil | Awesome, thanks! ❤️ Note that I really need to get back to sleep now, but I'll definitely get back to you! | 09:19:33 |
| hdloqfa joined the room. | 10:55:37 |
| @patka_123:matrix.org set a profile picture. | 14:21:14 |
| @patka_123:matrix.org changed their profile picture. | 14:21:32 |
| NixOS Moderation Botchanged room power levels. | 15:06:06 |
| shivranj joined the room. | 16:54:05 |
ronef | A few notes as we try to keep everything as open, updated and transparent as possible.
We are reading all posts of constructive feedback, and opinion. Hopefully to be taken into account as we move forward in the coming weeks.
We are now live conversing on how to establish the process of choosing the assembly.
I am also trying to figure out how to have super public conversations while also keeping them on track so please feel free to provide feedback on that as I know we can keep improving that. | 17:42:44 |
Janik (they/them) | Some good news for today:
[Announcing our Google Summer of Code participants
| 18:04:58 |
Janik (they/them) | * Some good news for today:
[Announcing our Google Summer of Code participants](https://discourse.nixos.org/t/announcing-our-google-summer-of-code-participants/44618) | 18:05:07 |
Janik (they/them) | * Some good news for today: Announcing our Google Summer of Code participants | 18:05:17 |
| oliver.falvai joined the room. | 18:37:36 |
| @daschw:matrix.org joined the room. | 18:50:51 |
| Grimmauld (moving to @grimmauld:grapevine.grimmauld.de) joined the room. | 19:32:32 |
Janik (they/them) | Usually I would just dm one of the board member or post this in a private channel because it's a lower hurdle, but we want to increase our transparency so I'll post this here instead:
Hey, we need to fill out some forms for Google Summer of Code payments, those contain legally binding agreements and banking information. I forwarded the google email to foundation@nixos.org, if desired we can also schedule a call for this, shouldn't take more then ~30mins total. We have to do this before 13.05.2024. Can one of the board members ack' me that they will deal with this?
| 22:19:57 |
ronef | Acking :P | 23:19:28 |
infinisil | Since it's also relevant here: https://github.com/NixOS/foundation/pull/142 | 23:31:02 |
raitobezarius | For full transparency: https://discourse.nixos.org/t/exciting-partnership-announcement-framework-community-nixos-communities-join-forces/44640 | 23:56:49 |
| 2 May 2024 |
| @patka_123:matrix.org changed their profile picture. | 07:34:18 |
| @patka_123:matrix.org changed their profile picture. | 07:40:48 |
| @patka_123:matrix.org changed their profile picture. | 07:42:36 |
ronef | Plan to make this the first in our open comms about the process
Will post in one hour but feel free to let me know if there's any critical comments
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fJfFeQqbvAqhTPjJKTgCVI5smgt2hAOeqMrkug6M7eQ/edit | 16:59:42 |
ronef | Redacted or Malformed Event | 17:04:44 |
djacu | Looks good Ron! As Jonas commented, no need to over think it. :) | 17:05:23 |
@joepie91:pixie.town | my two main comments:
- I think 48 hours may not be enough for the community to gain meaningful involvement in this process on the Zulip, if that is the intention - people will need some time to get used to the platform and ruleset
- setting a date for self-nominations seems to be putting the cart before the horse; it states that there is an inclination towards self-nomination (presumably informed by the Zulip discussions?), but then sets a date as if this has already been decided, and that seems in conflict
| 17:08:52 |
@joepie91:pixie.town | ronef: ^ | 17:09:25 |
ronef | Will try to clarify but can also comment -
The comment about the next two days is just to clarify that we are now exploring a good amount of items and will plan to communicate the general process by then.
To touch more directly:
- It's not expected to gain meaningful involvement in Zulip over the next 48 hours, rather just defining if/how we are using Zulip and communicating that.
- It's not expected that the this sets a date for self nominations, rather that the process will make that clearer
| 17:13:39 |
@joepie91:pixie.town | is "We aim to release the initial statement regarding self-nominating by May 3rd" maybe a clearer way to phrase it, in that case? | 17:14:22 |
@joepie91:pixie.town | to remove the suggestion that "self-nomination" as a procedure is already a certainty | 17:14:38 |
| @nick_kadutskyi:matrix.org joined the room. | 17:14:43 |
@joepie91:pixie.town | (if I understand you correctly) | 17:14:59 |