| 12 May 2024 |
 nyanbinary | https://nixpkgs.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/436732-Constitutional-assembly-applications/topic/Silvan.20Mosberger/near/438128853 | 00:38:03 |
| nyanbinary | It's very concerning to see that board members can "endorse"/vouch for applicants for the assembly | 00:38:20 |
| nyanbinary | Like does nobody see the conflict here lmfao | 00:39:04 |
| nyanbinary | Ron & Jonas vouched for Silvan here. | 00:40:46 |
| nyanbinary | Dare I say this is a bit biased :P | 00:45:24 |
 infinisil | nyanbinary I put it in myself, didn't ask them explicitly, I disclosed it in the conflict of interest section too | 00:46:18 |
| infinisil | Fully agreed that it looks a bit weird, but I don't think it should be. I helped them out a ton in the past two weeks ;) | 00:47:20 |
| nyanbinary | In reply to @infinisil:matrix.org
nyanbinary I put it in myself, didn't ask them explicitly, I disclosed it in the conflict of interest section too That still doesn't explain why they "vouch" for you though. | 00:48:44 |
| infinisil | nyanbinary It says "who can vouch for you", which I interpreted to mean that "if you ask these people about me, they'll probably say that they enjoyed working with me" | 00:50:43 |
