NixOS Foundation | 482 Members | |
| Public room for chatting with the NixOS Foundation Board | 122 Servers |
| Sender | Message | Time |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Apr 2024 | ||
| i am trying to learn more about the ongoing situation | 15:23:48 | |
| i haven't been able to closely follow everything that happens in nixos | 15:24:32 | |
| You're causing more noise. Read discourse, there's enough noise there. Let's leave this channel to what's in the channel topic. | 15:25:04 | |
| i am engaging with the channel's topic | 15:25:25 | |
| it seems there is also little place for me to voice my opinion given the long thread about military-industrial sponsorships is locked | 15:35:15 | |
| That is very understandable. The problem is that many people have put in loads more energy into these topics than they probably had for it. It is not an umderstatement that people have burnt out over this. Having to often start explaining things over and over again, while also trying to be "complete" to some extent is reasonably too much to ask from people. There is loads of information on Discourse. I think I'm pretty up to date and have some energy left. Feel free to send me questions in DM's and I'll try to answer to the best of my ability tomorrow. | 15:35:52 | |
| * That is very understandable. The problem is that many people have put in loads more energy into these topics than they probably had for it. It is not an understatement that people have burnt out over this. Having to often start explaining things over and over again, while also trying to be "complete" to some extent is reasonably too much to ask from people. There is loads of information on Discourse. I think I'm pretty up to date and have some energy left. Feel free to send me questions in DM's and I'll try to answer to the best of my ability tomorrow. | 15:36:13 | |
| * That is very understandable. The problem is that many people have put in loads more energy into these topics than they probably had for it. It is not an overstatement that people have burnt out over this. Having to often start explaining things over and over again, while also trying to be "complete" to some extent is reasonably too much to ask from people. There is loads of information on Discourse. I think I'm pretty up to date and have some energy left. Feel free to send me questions in DM's and I'll try to answer to the best of my ability tomorrow. | 15:41:33 | |
| Nix as an overall project is growing. Running this project in the current manner has downsides and consequences. Allowing strong anti-capitalism and anti-corporate sentiment to overwhelm the community means there will be less jobs, investment, and adoption necessary to provide the resources needed. Encouraging activism and political outcomes has consequences. This whole debate was never about a one-time $5k (delroth even offered to provide it). The real discussion is to decide what kind organization we want to become.
Yep... I've put out several. Including one last night to say that more people should try to encourage more funding: https://opencollective.com/nixos . This is truly an honest plea. The status quo is not working and won't scale. | 15:56:01 | |
In reply to @janik0:matrix.orgone thing I do want to point out here - that I have not seen previously mentioned in conversation - is that if the infra team are striking presumably because of the sponsor situation, and the strike means that we are unable to get rid of the AWS costs because of the strike, that functionally means that retaining the sponsor is actively costing the project money, and apparently more than it is bringing in | 15:57:08 | |
In reply to @tomberek:matrix.orgI find this rather disingenuous given that many of the same people who are objecting to corporate involvement, and whose concerns are basically being dismissed as "you're not being realistic with your funny anti-capitalist ideas", are the exact same people who have been warning about the financial consequences of relying on commercially-donated infrastructure for years due to its potential to become a sudden unaffordable cost - which is exactly what has happened | 15:59:09 | |
| and for which there has been basically no recognition | 15:59:25 | |
| joepie91 🏳️🌈: I think it's been mentioned a few times, but in general it's just one of many "hard to measure variables", aking to "driving away potential contributors opposed to MIC sponsorships" or (on the other side) "driving away corporate contributors" | 15:59:49 | |
In reply to @joepie91:pixie.towni also have to assume (given individuals have said this about their personal sponsorships), that there are other potential sponsors who are not willing to sponsor us as long as we are taking money from Anduril | 15:59:58 | |
| like, if we want to talk about what's realistic for keeping the project sustainable, it sure as hell wasn't the pro-corporate-involvement people who saw this coming and warned of it well ahead of time | 16:00:19 | |
| so be mindful where you draw those lines please | 16:00:35 | |
In reply to @delroth:delroth.netthe abstract cost of driving away contributors has been brought up before, yes, but not the concrete "unable to migrate" cost which is much more directly measurable | 16:01:29 | |
In reply to @delroth:delroth.net* the abstract cost of driving away contributors has been brought up before, yes, but not the concrete "unable to migrate" cost which is much more directly measurable (at least from what I've seen in conversations) | 16:02:11 | |
In reply to @tomberek:matrix.orgWhat do you personally think the cons are of allowing strong pro-capitalism and pro-corporate sentiment to overwhelm the community? | 16:03:38 | |
| tomberek: you're once again distorting the views of the people who oppose your viewpoint and it's frankly infuriating. You're talking about "strong anti-capitalism and anti-corporate sentiment", this is not at all what any of this has been about. You know that very well. Please stop. | 16:03:41 | |
| * tomberek: What do you personally think the cons are of allowing strong pro-capitalism and pro-corporate sentiment to overwhelm the community? | 16:04:27 | |
| nixcon NA, and nixcon EU before that, both had more than one corporate sponsor | 16:05:03 | |
| it's probably not news to you that only one corporate sponsor has been found to be problematic | 16:05:15 | |
| I'm at a loss trying to figure out if this is deliberately you acting in bad faith or just completely missing the point. | 16:06:05 | |
| * I'm at a loss trying to figure out if this is you deliberately acting in bad faith or just completely missing the point. | 16:06:13 | |
| * I'm at a loss trying to figure out if you are deliberately acting in bad faith or just completely missing the point. | 16:06:36 | |
There is a lot of nuance to this, yes the nix project is growing but there is a serious question if our project is growing in a sustainable way. Many teams, especially critical teams like the Nix Maintenance team or the infra team have not nearly seen a similar growth compared to the over all project growth. This is not about anti-corporate or anti-capitalism, this is as I already told you in my reply on discourse about not wanting to see our community being used to advertise MIC companies.
The way you frame your call for more personal sponsorships here from yesterday is disingenuous at best.
This is not just about potential revenue loss, I was approached by sponsors saying they won't sponsor again or thinking about dropping there sponsorship, and now of multiple people who stopped there personal monetary donation ships because of accepting anduril as a sponsor. I want to encourage everyone to take a 10 minute break and if you want to continue this discussion please open a appropriate discourse thread since this channel should stay low traffic. | 16:12:58 | |
*
There is a lot of nuance to this, yes the nix project is growing but there is a serious question if our project is growing in a sustainable way. Many teams, especially critical teams like the Nix Maintenance team or the infra team have not nearly seen a similar growth compared to the over all project growth. This is not about anti-corporate or anti-capitalism, this is as I already told you in my reply on discourse about not wanting to see our community being used to advertise MIC companies.
The way you frame your call for more personal sponsorships here from yesterday is disingenuous at best.
This is not just about potential revenue loss, I was approached by sponsors saying they won't sponsor again or thinking about dropping there sponsorship, and know of multiple people who stopped there personal monetary donation because of accepting anduril as a sponsor. I want to encourage everyone to take a 10 minute break and if you want to continue this discussion please open a appropriate discourse thread since this channel should stay low traffic. | 16:33:03 | |
| 17:00:08 | ||
In reply to @delroth:delroth.netJust now starting to read the thread so responding to a few items: This is on me, I have a full draft of the open financials but the last touches were delayed as I've been focusing most of my time on the sponsorship items Unless something else comes up I plan to post it publicly this weekend | 18:05:57 | |