| 11 Mar 2024 |
 Shalok Shalom | * You find a bit of information starting with that message: | 19:43:46 |
 @joepie91:pixie.town | right - my question is a bit broader than just nixcon, and I'm also mainly looking for an answer from the Foundation itself | 19:45:13 |
 @theophane:hufschmitt.net | In reply to @joepie91:pixie.town
can the Foundation clarify what the current relationships with Anduril are, if any? Anduril is a sponsor of NixCon, and they donate to the documentation project on OpenCollective | 19:47:03 |
 raitobezarius | NixCon NA to be precise | 19:47:30 |
| @joepie91:pixie.town | In reply to @theophane:hufschmitt.net
Anduril is a sponsor of NixCon, and they donate to the documentation project on OpenCollective thanks. and that's the full extent of the relationships? | 20:04:19 |
| @theophane:hufschmitt.net | Yes | 20:06:44 |
| @joepie91:pixie.town | alright, thanks for the clarification | 20:07:13 |
 MangoIV | Has there been a protocol somewhere about why Anduril has been decided to comply with the interim sponsorship policy? | 20:36:24 |
| MangoIV | It’s not entirely clear to me. | 20:36:31 |
 mei 🌒& | I think the best we have is https://discourse.nixos.org/t/nixos-foundation-board-meeting-minutes-2024-01-02-2024-02-03/39994#h-2024-02-03-foundation-board-in-person-fosdem-21 | 20:38:15 |
| MangoIV | I have seen this. Thank you :) it doesn’t answer my question that’s why I wondered whether there would be more information. | 20:39:11 |
 tomberek | I can help answer in DM or in this thread, as you wish. The closest thing to a codified policy is the discussion in matrix, followed by the resulting sponsorship policy proposal. I can also walk through the sequence of events. | 20:39:29 |
| MangoIV | Thank you I think the proposal is great, I just wonder how it has been decided that Anduril fulfils the requirements. | 20:41:06 |
| mei 🌒& | tomberek: Publicly please. | 20:47:32 |
 patka | There is not really much to oppose or question from my side. I just very much disagree with taking such a sponsor. So all I can do is remove donations to the Nix foundation | 20:48:57 |
| Shalok Shalom | In reply to @patka_123:matrix.org
There is not really much to oppose or question from my side. I just very much disagree with taking such a sponsor. So all I can do is remove donations to the Nix foundation I understand not liking, and not wanting to support such a company. | 20:51:48 |
| Shalok Shalom | Do you think, taking their money plays into that or is it purely a principle, to distance yourself so far as possible from them? | 20:52:22 |
| Shalok Shalom | Or do you see real life benefits for them, if we take the money? | 20:52:35 |
| patka | I'm not really interested in a philosophical back and forth, sorry | 20:53:23 |
| Shalok Shalom | thanks | 20:53:35 |
| Shalok Shalom | I think we all can agree, that it can make a bad light, when people discuss this within the open source community. | 20:55:50 |
| Shalok Shalom | Has this been taken under consideration? | 20:56:02 |
| patka | In reply to @shalokshalom:dendrite.matrix.org
Has this been taken under consideration? What are you implying? Discussing what? And why in a bad light? | 20:56:37 |
