| 3 May 2024 |
 @joepie91:pixie.town | Dandellion: while I understand the concern (and it is a genuine concern in and of itself), many of us have been working on this in some form for somewhere between months and years already, so there is very little energy left to get any kind of governance solution in place - and a significant effort was made to make this as broadly accessible as possible within the constraints | 22:41:11 |
| @joepie91:pixie.town | this is likely the same reason for the deflecting tone; people are simply exhausted | 22:41:34 |
 @emma:rory.gay | In reply to @paperdigits:matrix.org
For one matrix requires a completely separate app for moderation i dont think it does, but would love to hear more | 22:42:03 |
 @paperdigits:matrix.org | In reply to @emma:rory.gay
i dont think it does, but would love to hear more Sorry. Not app, its a bot: https://matrix.org/docs/communities/moderation/ | 22:43:32 |
| @emma:rory.gay | im surprised they link to mjolnir lol | 22:43:58 |
| @paperdigits:matrix.org | The discourse moderation tools are quite good, I've moderated a discourse instance for almost a decade now. They've put a lot of thought into the platform and the way it functions. | 22:44:27 |
| @emma:rory.gay | but yeah, thats something that simply isnt possible on something like matrix, versus discourse where yeah, you can easily just say "ban person from all topics" | 22:44:59 |
| @emma:rory.gay | and tbh i dont see it requiring a bot as a flaw, as it means you arent locked into one way of doing things | 22:47:15 |
| @paperdigits:matrix.org | I didn't say it was a flaw. It is different. I was also mod of a matrix room that was just a stock install, no bot, no anything except manually reading message. Terrible. | 22:48:38 |
