| 2 May 2024 |
 @joepie91:pixie.town | to remove the suggestion that "self-nomination" as a procedure is already a certainty | 17:14:38 |
|  @nick_kadutskyi:matrix.org joined the room. | 17:14:43 |
| @joepie91:pixie.town | (if I understand you correctly) | 17:14:59 |
 ronef | Seems fine with me | 17:15:24 |
| ronef | Also was working on this during my night so changed it to be 2 days which is May 4th :) | 17:16:24 |
| ronef | and also a momentous day among folks in far away galaxies. | 17:17:03 |
 raitobezarius | Yeah, I think we didn't agree to the self nomination procedure yet | 17:39:07 |
| raitobezarius | We should discuss this as part of the governance process ronef IMHO | 17:39:13 |
| raitobezarius | (self nomination is a choice) | 17:39:45 |
| ronef | I agree that none of this is yet defined, that's the point of the comm. While we can always keep iterating, I'm just erring on the side of frequent and transparent comms so that the entire community can have constant visibility. | 17:47:34 |
| @joepie91:pixie.town | the flipside is that mentioning specific options can prime expectations | 17:49:43 |
| ronef | Regarding dates, I'm iffy on the request to remove dates since I do want to have accountability on faster iterations. Worst case, if a date must move we can communicate and I'm sure it'll be understood? | 17:49:57 |
| raitobezarius | In reply to @ronef:matrix.org
Regarding dates, I'm iffy on the request to remove dates since I do want to have accountability on faster iterations. Worst case, if a date must move we can communicate and I'm sure it'll be understood? Ack on the date | 17:50:15 |
| raitobezarius | In reply to @ronef:matrix.org
I agree that none of this is yet defined, that's the point of the comm. While we can always keep iterating, I'm just erring on the side of frequent and transparent comms so that the entire community can have constant visibility. I still think we can ask people to partake in the Zulip to define this | 17:50:22 |
| raitobezarius | Like this can be the first question literally | 17:50:26 |
| raitobezarius | But I would advise not putting it in the comms | 17:50:31 |
| @joepie91:pixie.town | (I do not have an objection to the date, if it is just meant to specify when the next update is scheduled to be published, rather than setting a deadline for the community to do anything) | 17:50:49 |
| *  infinisil looking | 17:57:50 |
| infinisil | ronef: I'll just leave some comments in the doc | 18:00:14 |
|  NixOS Moderation Bot unbanned  @ultranix:matrix.org. | 19:05:08 |
|  @fundar:matrix.org joined the room. | 19:19:03 |
|  Hayden joined the room. | 20:43:51 |
| @nick_kadutskyi:matrix.org set a profile picture. | 21:19:14 |
| ronef | took most feedback and posted the first update here -> https://discourse.nixos.org/t/board-update-1-starting-process-and-transparent-comms/44735 | 22:08:47 |
| 3 May 2024 |
| ronef | I have a few meetings tomorrow with folks from the wider open source ecosystem. So far haven't received any outside recommendations (I would love to go beyond my personal network!) so keep me posted if someone crosses your mind! | 05:22:29 |
 nat-418 | In reply to @ronef:matrix.org
I have a few meetings tomorrow with folks from the wider open source ecosystem. So far haven't received any outside recommendations (I would love to go beyond my personal network!) so keep me posted if someone crosses your mind! please contact the Guix team if you haven't already: Simon Tournier, Ludovic Courtès, etc. https://foundation.guix.info/ | 07:40:58 |
|  @Las:matrix.org left the room. | 09:01:43 |
 Arian | They seem to be at a very small scale though. Only 27 members. And most of their actual finances are being paid for by the FSF and are not even on their balance sheet. I'm not sure if there are enough parallels. | 11:52:59 |
| Arian | But still fun to talk with probably. | 11:53:31 |
|  Federico Damián Schonborn changed their profile picture. | 11:57:54 |
