NixOS Foundation | 473 Members | |
| Public room for chatting with the NixOS Foundation Board | 119 Servers |
| Sender | Message | Time |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Mar 2024 | ||
| 01:37:02 | ||
| If I want to have food reimbursed for the new york meetup, I have to submit the reimbursement request after the event and provide the invoice right? Anything else I need to be aware of? | 21:33:48 | |
In reply to @twitchy0:matrix.orgyes, add the receipt to the opencollective, and ideally link back to the funding request in the description | 23:34:48 | |
| 18 Mar 2024 | ||
| Submitted an update to the proposed sponsorship policy: https://github.com/NixOS/foundation/issues/110#issuecomment-2002915462 | 04:39:29 | |
| 10:56:42 | ||
| Hey Domen want's to add a devenv idea to the NixOS GSoC. The question here is basically do we want to allow Community Projects that have a commercial touch. I would be fine if we do so, just wanted to give people the chance to voice their concerns if there are any. I think it would be awesome to host other Nix projects under the foundations gsoc umbrella. | 13:58:34 | |
| I'm not too familiar with the history of GSoC in NixOS, but isn't the point of that programme to provide funding for things that would otherwise go unfunded and not get done? as in that context, it would seem odd to me to add a commercial project to the list (which already has its own source of funding) | 14:28:19 | |
| What makes devenv a commercial project though? | 14:41:23 | |
| We don't have a history with GSoC this is the first-time we actually managed to send a application.
As far as I understand the point of the program is to onboard people to OSS giving them a kind of internship. | 14:41:34 | |
| (also a potential mentee asked if there is any devenv related work which is why domen handed in a devenv related idea) | 14:42:31 | |
| oh, I got it mixed up with season of docs I think: https://discourse.nixos.org/t/season-of-docs-gsoc-for-documentation/2402 | 14:43:48 | |
In reply to @arianvp:matrix.orgIt's backed by cachix | 14:44:57 | |
In reply to @joepie91:pixie.townDon't know how the docs counter part handles it. It might also be important to note that GSoC only pays participants but not mentors. In general I agree that it's preferable to work on projects that are directly related to the nixos org but afaik we don't have a hard cap on participants so I don't see a problem with helping nix community projects. | 15:00:10 | |
| I mean, I don't have an issue with non-NixOS-org projects in and of itself, just specifically with ones that already receive funding | 15:01:58 | |
| * I mean, I don't have an issue with non-NixOS-org projects in and of itself, just specifically with ones that already receive funding [within a certain definition] | 15:02:15 | |
| on the premise that the funding is better spent on things that otherwise have no chance of happening | 15:02:28 | |
| if it is added specifically because someone requested to work on it, I am not sure how that fits into this exactly | 15:02:46 | |
| * if it is added specifically because someone requested to work on it, I am not sure how that fits into this rationale exactly | 15:05:31 | |
| maybe a better way to describe it, would be that I wouldn't want the GSoC funding to become a way for NixOS-adjacent companies to save a buck on their own investment, when that money could have gone to things that they would never have put money into to begin with | 15:06:25 | |
| (ie. if that is not the case, then I have no issue with it) | 15:09:57 | |
| * (ie. if that is not the case, regardless of which part of that description doesn't hold up, then I have no issue with it) | 15:10:19 | |
it's encouraged by GSoC for people to suggest their own ideas if they don't find anything that interests them in the already listed ideas. | 15:14:53 | |
| right | 15:15:10 | |
| it sounds like in this case my concern might not apply, then | 15:15:24 | |
| 15:19:43 | ||
| 16:42:25 | ||
| FWIW, I feel aligned with joepie91 🏳️🌈 . This is also our first year with the program so I don't have much experience with it. If we feel it would be helpful I can ask a few other communities who might have been doing the program for longer for their approach to it. | 18:25:59 | |
| 18:39:42 | ||
In reply to @ronef:matrix.org a reasonable policy might be something like:
| 19:20:57 | |
| There is a question of what falls within the scope of the project, but overall I think the focus should be on finding capable mentors, and more importantly that the students are having a good experience and hopefully become our star contributors of tomorrow. Most of the time, my understanding is that GSoC is more work for the mentor and the quality of contributions are those of a junior. I wouldn't count this exactly as free work. | 20:33:07 | |