| 21 Jun 2024 |
 jakegrin | Okay what else is needed? | 16:49:55 |
 K900 | I do not know | 16:50:16 |
 raitobezarius | I recommend letting people involved deal with it | 16:50:19 |
| K900 | As stated, it's up to the people that stepped down | 16:50:24 |
| K900 | To decide whether they want to step back up, and what that would take | 16:50:33 |
| raitobezarius | I don't know you, jakegrin but you really participated in those discussions only in time of incidents, this does not bode well | 16:50:43 |
| raitobezarius | I would recommend taking a step back and letting "directly" involved people express themselves | 16:50:58 |
| raitobezarius | (and if you feel directly involved, please express yourself!) | 16:51:07 |
| jakegrin | Sorry please don’t ban me | 16:51:16 |
| raitobezarius | I don't see why we would ban you for this… | 16:51:45 |
|  @patka_123:matrix.org joined the room. | 16:56:51 |
|  @razthecat:matrix.org joined the room. | 22:28:48 |
| @razthecat:matrix.org set a profile picture. | 22:36:33 |
| 22 Jun 2024 |
|  @taffisher:matrix.org joined the room. | 00:53:29 |
 @foo:tchncs.de | In reply to @raitobezarius:matrix.org
I don't see why we would ban you for this… why wouldn't they get banned in such turblent times like this | 19:21:53 |
| K900 | This is unnecessary provocation, please stop | 19:22:38 |
| @foo:tchncs.de | In reply to @k900:0upti.me
This is unnecessary provocation, please stop it's not a provocation, it's a simple fact of the matter | 19:24:14 |
|  NixOS Moderation Bot banned @foo:tchncs.de (<no reason supplied>). | 19:24:36 |
|  @fiveseven:matrix.org joined the room. | 20:41:08 |
| NixOS Moderation Bot banned @fiveseven:matrix.org (code of conduct violations). | 20:41:08 |
 hexa | matrix.org coc banlist fwiw | 20:42:18 |
|  @rgbcube:rgbcu.be joined the room. | 20:43:07 |
|  Nikke joined the room. | 21:49:14 |
| 23 Jun 2024 |
 @emma:rory.gay | m.org coc banlist isnt exactly the most reputable list out there because they tend to do quite subjective bans | 11:59:43 |
 Valodim | Not like there is such a thing as objective criteria for bans though | 13:33:14 |
 Ami | this isn't a case of the "it's unfair, bans should be objective" kind of thing, i haven't followed the matrix.org coc list closely enough to provide a detailed comment on it, but i'm getting the impression that some of the ban reasons on there are questionable | 13:45:26 |
| @emma:rory.gay | ^ what i was saying | 13:46:07 |
| @emma:rory.gay | m.org-coc has a bit of a history of being "i dont like this person, so im going to ban them for coc violations" | 13:46:39 |
| @emma:rory.gay | In reply to @Valodim:stratum0.org
Not like there is such a thing as objective criteria for bans though there is, though | 13:48:31 |
| @emma:rory.gay | #community-moderation-effort-bl:neko.dev is an example of a list where subjective bans just simply arent allowed and will get you removed | 13:49:12 |
