!CJXQiUGqNPcFonEdME:nixos.org

NixOS Foundation

479 Members
Public room for chatting with the NixOS Foundation Board119 Servers

You have reached the beginning of time (for this room).


SenderMessageTime
19 Apr 2024
@alejandrosame:matrix.org@alejandrosame:matrix.orgBut again NLnet doesn't necessarily have the same goals as nixpkgs20:38:15
@delroth:delroth.net@delroth:delroth.netdo you think nlnet is properly aware of what they're getting out of SoN?20:38:31
@delroth:delroth.net@delroth:delroth.netalso, low efficiency isn't really debatable when you take groups of 5 participants and they end up having lower output (even after months of being in the program) than I'd expect a single nixpkgs committer would have in the same unit of time20:41:20
@delroth:delroth.net@delroth:delroth.net(we've seen this in practice with e.g. pretalx)20:41:37
@delroth:delroth.net@delroth:delroth.net(where, on top of being duplicated work, the duplicated work took significantly more person-hours than what ended up being done by a single contributor in nixpkgs)20:41:57
@alejandrosame:matrix.org@alejandrosame:matrix.org
In reply to @delroth:delroth.net
do you think nlnet is properly aware of what they're getting out of SoN?
No clue tbh
20:42:28
@janik0:matrix.orgJanik (they/them)

First of all to be fully transparent: I'm one of the facilitator for this year and thus have a financial tie to this project.

  • In the end this is an NLnet project, not a NixOS foundation project, so their own pressure on setting their own objectives has to be taken into account.

that's not entirely true, since it's a project in colab with the nixos foundation and all the financial stuff and contracts are handled through the foundation.

20:44:07
@delroth:delroth.net@delroth:delroth.netalso, even if nlnet strictly set the goals (which I don't believe they do - it's probably fairly loosely defined, as it should be), there would still be significant leeway in how to achieve those goals, and that's the space I think would be worth exploring because I don't believe the SoN methods are being effective20:45:39
@alejandrosame:matrix.org@alejandrosame:matrix.org
In reply to @delroth:delroth.net
also, low efficiency isn't really debatable when you take groups of 5 participants and they end up having lower output (even after months of being in the program) than I'd expect a single nixpkgs committer would have in the same unit of time
My comment of being debatable is more on the point of under which constraints are we talking about. Aka, I'm willing to talk specifics in detail to understand myself whenever I ran projects like this, but also I'm not a person with any decision making impact in any of this.
20:46:10

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 10