| 5 May 2023 |
 @kranzes:matrix.org | and output path at the end | 18:55:08 |
| @kranzes:matrix.org | so the last question | 18:55:10 |
| @kranzes:matrix.org | That logically sits best with me | 18:55:29 |
 figsoda | feel free to drop a comment here: https://github.com/nix-community/nix-init/issues/72 | 19:04:46 |
| figsoda | I'm looking for suggestions like this, and also stuff like configuration | 19:05:29 |
| @kranzes:matrix.org | In reply to @figsoda:matrix.org
feel free to drop a comment here: https://github.com/nix-community/nix-init/issues/72 Ok i commented | 19:15:38 |
| @kranzes:matrix.org | Another feature I had in mind I just commented | 19:21:40 |
|  @archive:matrix.org joined the room. | 23:48:07 |
| 7 May 2023 |
 raitobezarius | I have a usecase for nix-init: https://github.com/bram2w/baserow/commit/2bbb22be2fd39a2877930bb7957be31ef246252a#diff-930c90821797b3eed215c57ad83e0ffb363d8d473275dfee36fa88498aed558d | 21:10:58 |
| raitobezarius | how far are we from being able to autopackage all of those figsoda ? | 21:11:05 |
| raitobezarius | I know we need sourceRoot input probably as this is a monorepo | 21:11:13 |
| raitobezarius | except if we use fetchPypi | 21:11:17 |
| figsoda | In reply to @raitobezarius:matrix.org
how far are we from being able to autopackage all of those figsoda ? probably just sourceRoot | 21:12:15 |
| raitobezarius | would you be open to such a PR? | 21:12:22 |
| figsoda | python support is pretty good | 21:12:24 |
| figsoda | In reply to @raitobezarius:matrix.org
would you be open to such a PR? yes | 21:12:34 |
| figsoda | though the packages probably still needs manual work because of how python dependencies work in nixpkgs | 21:13:13 |
| raitobezarius | what do you mean? | 21:13:22 |
| raitobezarius | will it vendor all its python deps? | 21:13:33 |
| figsoda | no | 21:13:46 |
| figsoda | it will use the ones in nixpkgs | 21:13:56 |
| raitobezarius | perfect? | 21:13:59 |
| figsoda | and if they use a different version they would be problems | 21:14:04 |
| raitobezarius | I want to package this for nixpkgs | 21:14:04 |
| raitobezarius | ah yes | 21:14:09 |
| raitobezarius | dependency relaxation | 21:14:12 |
| figsoda | * and if they use a different version there would be problems | 21:14:15 |
| raitobezarius | figsoda: is the devshell compatible with envrc? | 21:14:50 |
| raitobezarius | * figsoda: is the devshell compatible with envrc/direnv? | 21:14:51 |
| figsoda | I would imagine so? idk | 21:15:04 |
