| 5 May 2023 |
 @kranzes:matrix.org | figsoda It writes an empty file even if you Ctrl+C | 18:41:25 |
| @kranzes:matrix.org | Can you make this atomic so it only writes the file if nix-init exits with code 0? | 18:42:10 |
| @kranzes:matrix.org | Does that sound like a good behavior? | 18:42:20 |
 figsoda | In reply to @kranzes:matrix.org
figsoda It writes an empty file even if you Ctrl+C It does, I wanted to open the file early on so it doesn't run into permission issues after you've answered all the questions | 18:42:56 |
| figsoda | I'm not sure how that would be possible without creating the file, maybe it should just check for permissions and not open the file until it is ready to write? | 18:43:31 |
| @kranzes:matrix.org | I accidentally create empty files many time because in my head I first enter the URL instead of path | 18:43:35 |
| @kranzes:matrix.org | I do this by accident all the time | 18:44:26 |
| @kranzes:matrix.org | Enter output path (defaults to current directory)
❯ https://github.com/nix-community/nix-init
Enter url
❯
Error: Interrupted
[kranzes@pongo ~/test]$ ls
https:
[kranzes@pongo ~/test]$ tree
.
└── https:
└── github.com
└── nix-community
└── nix-init
3 directories, 1 file
[kranzes@pongo ~/test]
| 18:44:30 |
| figsoda | oh yeah that's maybe not the best hehavior | 18:44:57 |
| @kranzes:matrix.org | I mean ideally, I should stop making this stupid mistake | 18:54:31 |
| @kranzes:matrix.org | but I still do it idk lol | 18:54:39 |
| @kranzes:matrix.org | I find it to make more sense to have URL as the first question | 18:55:00 |
| @kranzes:matrix.org | then all the others | 18:55:03 |
| @kranzes:matrix.org | and output path at the end | 18:55:08 |
| @kranzes:matrix.org | so the last question | 18:55:10 |
| @kranzes:matrix.org | That logically sits best with me | 18:55:29 |
| figsoda | feel free to drop a comment here: https://github.com/nix-community/nix-init/issues/72 | 19:04:46 |
| figsoda | I'm looking for suggestions like this, and also stuff like configuration | 19:05:29 |
| @kranzes:matrix.org | In reply to @figsoda:matrix.org
feel free to drop a comment here: https://github.com/nix-community/nix-init/issues/72 Ok i commented | 19:15:38 |
| @kranzes:matrix.org | Another feature I had in mind I just commented | 19:21:40 |
|  @archive:matrix.org joined the room. | 23:48:07 |
| 7 May 2023 |
 raitobezarius | I have a usecase for nix-init: https://github.com/bram2w/baserow/commit/2bbb22be2fd39a2877930bb7957be31ef246252a#diff-930c90821797b3eed215c57ad83e0ffb363d8d473275dfee36fa88498aed558d | 21:10:58 |
| raitobezarius | how far are we from being able to autopackage all of those figsoda ? | 21:11:05 |
| raitobezarius | I know we need sourceRoot input probably as this is a monorepo | 21:11:13 |
| raitobezarius | except if we use fetchPypi | 21:11:17 |
| figsoda | In reply to @raitobezarius:matrix.org
how far are we from being able to autopackage all of those figsoda ? probably just sourceRoot | 21:12:15 |
| raitobezarius | would you be open to such a PR? | 21:12:22 |
| figsoda | python support is pretty good | 21:12:24 |
| figsoda | In reply to @raitobezarius:matrix.org
would you be open to such a PR? yes | 21:12:34 |
| figsoda | though the packages probably still needs manual work because of how python dependencies work in nixpkgs | 21:13:13 |
