| 16 Feb 2025 |
 @elvishjerricco:matrix.org | don't think so | 16:56:41 |
| @elvishjerricco:matrix.org | (I have put emacs in there before though :P) | 16:56:56 |
 K900 | And of course I fucked up the three hardest to reach machines in the apartmnet | 16:59:02 |
| K900 | * And of course I fucked up the three hardest to reach machines in the apartment | 16:59:03 |
| @elvishjerricco:matrix.org | I wonder how much initrd would grow if we included nano by default | 17:00:14 |
| @elvishjerricco:matrix.org | if it's like, 100K, then we should probably just do that | 17:00:27 |
 infinisil | Whew, 48MB closure size for nano | 17:01:30 |
| infinisil | Didn't expect that | 17:01:36 |
| @elvishjerricco:matrix.org | Yea and I don't think we have file or ncurses in initrd already | 17:01:51 |
| @elvishjerricco:matrix.org | still, we'll only end up including a fraction of their files | 17:02:03 |
| infinisil | Alternatively, busybox has vi :P | 17:04:33 |
| infinisil | (and ed) | 17:04:38 |
| @elvishjerricco:matrix.org | oh gosh, our baseline initrd has ballooned to 20M | 17:05:08 |
| @elvishjerricco:matrix.org | did not realize that | 17:05:10 |
| @elvishjerricco:matrix.org | that's... worse than I would like | 17:05:19 |
| @elvishjerricco:matrix.org | * oh gosh, our baseline systemd initrd has ballooned to 20M | 17:05:26 |
| @elvishjerricco:matrix.org | yea, scripted is only 11M | 17:06:07 |
| @elvishjerricco:matrix.org | anyway yea nano only adds about 200K to the initrd size | 17:06:53 |
| @elvishjerricco:matrix.org | that's probably acceptable... But I may want to go hunting down what's got initrd so big these days | 17:07:08 |
| @elvishjerricco:matrix.org | (mind you, I don't actually know that nano works if all you do is add it to initrdBin) | 17:07:41 |
| @elvishjerricco:matrix.org | ok yea it's definitely not that simple. Error opening terminal: vt220. | 17:13:28 |
| 17 Feb 2025 |
| @elvishjerricco:matrix.org | Did this ever actually happen? | 18:19:38 |
 Arian | the decision happened. The result didn't | 18:50:41 |
 Ilan Joselevich (Kranzes) | Classico | 18:53:48 |
| Arian | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/216025. do nixos-containers break with networkd enabled? Or is the current impl just not ideal | 18:54:42 |
| Arian | if it’s the second; then I don’t think we have any blockers? | 18:54:51 |
| Arian | cc @m1cr0man:m1cr0man.com | 18:55:15 |
 m1cr0man | Iirc it is the second but I will test. Alas, that PR is broken when rebased due to changes needed in switch-to-configuration-ng. I wasn't able to complete it myself in the time I last had. See #nix-rfc-108:matrix.org | 19:22:08 |
| Arian | I don’t fully understand why we need to change stc. I naively assumed we could just call stc inside the container. but it has been a long time since I had all the context of 108 in my head | 19:25:36 |
 ma27 | In reply to @arianvp:matrix.org
I don’t fully understand why we need to change stc. I naively assumed we could just call stc inside the container. but it has been a long time since I had all the context of 108 in my head if you change the nixos config of a container, then sure you need to call stc inside the container.
if you change something else around the container (i.e. in the nspawn unit), you'll probably need to restart it. | 19:31:29 |
