!DBFhtjpqmJNENpLDOv:nixos.org

NixOS systemd

579 Members
NixOS ❤️ systemd159 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
11 Mar 2025
@elvishjerricco:matrix.org@elvishjerricco:matrix.org"EFI says to allocate here" and systemd-boot says "but I WANTED it behind there!"18:11:28
@elvishjerricco:matrix.org@elvishjerricco:matrix.org sidenote, I'm extremely annoyed by andre4ik3's comment claiming to show the answer clearly when it's anything but clear 18:13:13
@aloisw:julia0815.dealoisw If xmalloc_initrd_pages is the correct function, then it asks the firmware to allocate anywhere below 4G: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/7fa3b5018bfffa176c77a2a5794dce792eebadcb/src/boot/util.h#L111-L115 18:15:59
@elvishjerricco:matrix.org@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgyes18:16:15
@elvishjerricco:matrix.org@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgso why should 358M be hard to allocate below 4G?18:16:28
@aloisw:julia0815.dealoiswIt just asks the firmware to do that and it fails, ask the firmware I guess.18:16:48
@elvishjerricco:matrix.org@elvishjerricco:matrix.org(unless the decompressed size is huge)18:16:51
@elvishjerricco:matrix.org@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgwait not it doesn't decompress18:17:05
@aloisw:julia0815.dealoiswSystemd-boot does not decompress the initrd and I think the kernel alread18:17:07
@elvishjerricco:matrix.org@elvishjerricco:matrix.org* wait no it doesn't decompress18:17:09
@aloisw:julia0815.dealoisw* Systemd-boot does not decompress the initrd and I think the kernel already has virtual memory at the point it does.18:17:18
@elvishjerricco:matrix.org@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgregardless, the bug on nixos's side is how the hell we made a 358M initrd18:18:00
@elvishjerricco:matrix.org@elvishjerricco:matrix.orggod dammit nvidia firmware18:41:01
@elvishjerricco:matrix.org@elvishjerricco:matrix.org K900: do you expect that putting your nvidia modules / firmware in initrd would make it 358M? Because that's what happened 18:41:35
@elvishjerricco:matrix.org@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgI don't know why it only happened for them on unstable, but I suspect they left some info out18:42:19
@k900:0upti.meK900 Uhh 18:48:39
@k900:0upti.meK900I think the Nvidia firmware is chonky18:48:45
@k900:0upti.meK900 But I don't know if it's that chonky 18:48:50
@antifuchs:asf.computerantifuchsDid it pull in a ton of x11 libs?19:03:12
@elvishjerricco:matrix.org@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgthe firmware files wouldn't19:30:15
@adam_neverwas:matrix.orgAdam Neverwas removed their display name adam_neverwas.23:24:10
12 Mar 2025
@adam_neverwas:matrix.orgAdam Neverwas set their display name to Adam Neverwas.14:27:30
13 Mar 2025
@mornix:matrix.orgmornix Hi, I saw this is the place to talk about boot counting (via #330017). Is https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/337089 still seen as the way forward? And if so how can I help with boot counting? 01:16:26
17 Mar 2025
@antifuchs:asf.computerantifuchs well this is unpleasant: it seems that systemd-networkd is now starting after zfs filesystems get unlocked, which makes it difficult for my ssh server to get online so I can remotely enter the encryption password 13:11:46
@antifuchs:asf.computerantifuchs also, huh, did boot.initrd.systemd start setting networking.usePredictableInterfaceNames to off? I had to set up a rule for eno1 but that device isn't present, only eno1np0 and eno1np1 13:32:23
@antifuchs:asf.computerantifuchs * also, huh, did boot.initrd.systemd change interface naming schemes? I had to set up a rule for eno1 but that device isn't present, only eno1np0 and eno1np1 13:34:53
@antifuchs:asf.computerantifuchs * also, huh, did boot.initrd.systemd change interface naming schemes in nixos-unstable? I had to set up a rule for eno1 but that device isn't present, only eno1np0 and eno1np1 13:35:02
@gdamjan:spodeli.orggdamjanthat seems to be kernel dependent13:41:16
@antifuchs:asf.computerantifuchsyeah, seems so. I should make up my own names for netdevs13:52:11
@antifuchs:asf.computerantifuchsstill, what a damn trap to run into /:13:52:20

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6