| 10 Mar 2025 |
 raitobezarius | (pc.c file) | 18:17:13 |
| raitobezarius | but you need a QEMU rebuild | 18:17:19 |
| raitobezarius | a OVMF rebuild may be easier | 18:17:23 |
 @elvishjerricco:matrix.org | right | 18:17:24 |
| raitobezarius | if you want to do it in OVMF | 18:18:11 |
| raitobezarius | for (Link = gMemoryMap.ForwardLink; Link != &gMemoryMap; Link = Link->ForwardLink) {
Entry = CR (Link, MEMORY_MAP, Link, MEMORY_MAP_SIGNATURE);
ASSERT (Entry->VirtualStart == 0);
``
| 18:18:13 |
| raitobezarius | this is the start of the code you want to hook | 18:18:17 |
| raitobezarius | in Page.c | 18:18:18 |
| raitobezarius | you want to check the ranges and just continue; it | 18:18:24 |
| @elvishjerricco:matrix.org | this is probably better to do with qemu | 18:18:28 |
| raitobezarius | a QEMU patch is definitely going to be a stronger indicator | 18:18:38 |
| raitobezarius | don't forget to boot the VM with RAM above 4GB though :D | 18:18:59 |
| @elvishjerricco:matrix.org | fun fun | 18:19:09 |
| @elvishjerricco:matrix.org | I think I'm going to wait for like... anyone else to say anything, like the user with the issue or the systemd folks on the systemd issue | 18:19:42 |
| @elvishjerricco:matrix.org | before I spend the time fucking with qemu like that | 18:20:00 |
| @elvishjerricco:matrix.org | raitobezarius: So the guy has an Intel i7-13700K on an Asus Z690 board. That 100% shouldn't have the 4GB boundary issue, right? | 21:11:15 |
| raitobezarius | that's 2022 grade CPU | 21:11:38 |
| raitobezarius | that surprise me a lot | 21:11:42 |
| @elvishjerricco:matrix.org | yea me too | 21:11:56 |
| @elvishjerricco:matrix.org | makes me think it's not the 4GB issue at all | 21:12:03 |
| raitobezarius | at this point, i'd ask sha256sum | 21:12:45 |
| raitobezarius | for the uefi binary | 21:12:48 |
| @elvishjerricco:matrix.org | emily: btw can you think of a fancy jj command to find the commit where the systemd update commit I want them to test was merged into master? | 21:15:24 |
| @elvishjerricco:matrix.org | obviously the systemd update was on staging | 21:15:34 |
 emily | master here as a proxy for a channel bump? | 21:18:43 |
| @elvishjerricco:matrix.org | pretty much | 21:18:55 |
| @elvishjerricco:matrix.org | I'm trying to find the masters before and after that round of staging | 21:19:05 |
| emily | roots(commit:: & description(glob:"staging-next *")) is kinda lame, but it works | 21:24:12 |
| emily | there's probably something nicer you can do with the topology | 21:24:24 |
| emily | if you could access the first-parents (planned feature) it would be easy, but it's a little bit mind-bending without that | 21:24:48 |
