| 7 Mar 2025 |
eliasp | just digging through my system, I find sooo much broken stuff that I document ~50% of it at best in my local notes…
…of those, maybe another 25% make it into a bugreport | 14:57:42 |
eliasp | latest find… KDE applications whose window just disappears (broken Wayland connection?), but still has an app unit with the process inside etc. | 14:59:22 |
| Qyriad changed their display name from Qyriad to qyriad. | 16:37:39 |
| lisipu joined the room. | 18:10:18 |
Arian | which files? which permission errors | 18:56:13 |
| Adam Neverwas joined the room. | 20:44:47 |
| 8 Mar 2025 |
| @ncfavier:matrix.org changed their profile picture. | 10:43:37 |
| Qyriad changed their display name from qyriad to Qyriad. | 21:41:03 |
@srestegosaurio:tchncs.de | In reply to @arianvp:matrix.org which files? which permission errors I have a rule (defined in home-managee iirc) to regularly clean up my downloads directory and while it does clean up files some(?) dirs persist. | 23:54:08 |
@srestegosaurio:tchncs.de | I am not with my computer atm but I swear it should be cleaning up sub dirs too, right? | 23:54:45 |
| 9 Mar 2025 |
Arian | Sorry this is completely insufficient amount of information to give any kind of help lol | 08:55:19 |
@srestegosaurio:tchncs.de | Mb, I was sleepy. What information would be helpful to debug this?
| 08:59:09 |
@srestegosaurio:tchncs.de | The rule in question is the following: "e /home/srestegosaurio/net-files 700 srestegosaurio users 7d -".
| 09:02:45 |
@srestegosaurio:tchncs.de | It does work for files.
| 09:03:16 |
| 10 Mar 2025 |
ElvishJerricco | Looks like we have a possibly serious systemd-boot bug: https://discourse.nixos.org/t/systemd-boot-failing-to-boot-a-nixos-warbler-system-due-to-an-efi-assertion-failure/61450 | 17:29:53 |
ElvishJerricco | It's probably upstream | 17:30:05 |
ElvishJerricco | * It's probably an upstream issue | 17:30:10 |
ElvishJerricco | anyone seen this before? | 17:30:14 |
ElvishJerricco | Seems similar to this: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/35026 | 17:42:44 |
raitobezarius | they're still allocating below 4G boundary for x86_64 | 17:48:26 |
raitobezarius | instead of doing it only for i386 | 17:48:29 |
ElvishJerricco | raitobezarius: So is the implication that this user has x86_64 hardware with no physical memory below 4G? | 17:50:44 |
ElvishJerricco | is that a thing? | 17:50:50 |
aloisw | In reply to @elvishjerricco:matrix.org Seems similar to this: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/35026 How the heck does "no physical memory below 4GiB" even work? IIRC UEFI does identity mapping and the PE file format has 32-bit addresses. | 17:52:55 |
raitobezarius | In reply to @elvishjerricco:matrix.org is that a thing? yes, AMD Opteron A1100 | 17:56:33 |
raitobezarius | uhm | 17:56:46 |
raitobezarius | I am tired | 17:56:48 |
raitobezarius | Opteraon A1100 is ARM64 | 17:56:53 |
aloisw | (also I think SMM memory has to be below 4G too) | 17:56:53 |
raitobezarius | I cannot find hardware doing that OTOH right now | 17:57:14 |