!DBFhtjpqmJNENpLDOv:nixos.org

NixOS systemd

611 Members
NixOS ❤️ systemd165 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
28 Jun 2021
@jkarlson:kapsi.fiEmil Karlsonit seems to me like systemd competition strives to do nothing new or innovative, but I don't really think mainstream wants to go back to that03:43:20
@antifuchs:asf.computerantifuchsNot many of the things that claim to replace it try to do anything more than be a better init, with maybe some parallelism03:48:06
@antifuchs:asf.computerantifuchs* Not many of the things that claim to replace it try to do anything more than be a better init, with maybe some parallelism and process restarts03:48:24
@haugh:matrix.orghaugha lot of the systemd resistance I've seen comes from concern about UNIX philosophy, but (at least from my perspective) putting the whole system layer in one place is the main draw03:49:04
@haugh:matrix.orghaughI wish they'd used a standard config format though for crying out loud03:49:23
@haugh:matrix.orghaughI really love the mounts and sockets functionality which I haven't found anywhere else.03:50:08
@antifuchs:asf.computerantifuchs Same and also the tempdir & user management 04:10:09
@gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.orgGytis Ivaskevicius
In reply to @haugh:matrix.org
a lot of the systemd resistance I've seen comes from concern about UNIX philosophy, but (at least from my perspective) putting the whole system layer in one place is the main draw
yeah, i dont really care about that much. If you do - you probably should get rid of stuff like browsers, IDE's, DE's, heck probably Linux kernel as well :D
04:54:41
@gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.orgGytis IvaskeviciusWhat i do dislike that systemd parts that have value on its own are coupled as part of systemd package and you can not compile them without base init 04:55:35
@gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.orgGytis Ivaskevicius
In reply to @haugh:matrix.org
a lot of the systemd resistance I've seen comes from concern about UNIX philosophy, but (at least from my perspective) putting the whole system layer in one place is the main draw
* yeah, I don't really care about that much. If someone does wish to follow unix - he probably should get rid of stuff like browsers, IDE's, DE's, heck probably Linux kernel as well :D
04:56:43
@roosemberth:orbstheorem.chRoos
In reply to @haugh:matrix.org
I wish they'd used a standard config format though for crying out loud
It's INI files, is it not?
05:02:02
@haugh:matrix.orghaugh not quite 05:03:52
@haugh:matrix.orghaughI don't know if this was intentional but the use of a proprietary config format prevents people like me from going whole-hog on generating configs before we understand how the system works. Like instead of generating a bunch of separate service units with heredocs (literally the first thing I did), you should be using transients05:06:46
@jkarlson:kapsi.fiEmil Karlsontransients for what?05:08:51
@haugh:matrix.orghaugh
In reply to @gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.org
yeah, I don't really care about that much. If someone does wish to follow unix - he probably should get rid of stuff like browsers, IDE's, DE's, heck probably Linux kernel as well :D
respectful disagree on this; something like a web browser is a pile of different technologies because you don't control both ends of the conversation. Web design would be somehow even more insane if users could roll their own combinations of JS envs and CSS renderers, for example
05:09:30
@gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.orgGytis Ivaskeviciuswell in terms of browsers contract is html and css between any two systems05:10:46
@gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.orgGytis Ivaskeviciusas a common language js was accepted and used everywhere05:11:00
@gytis-ivaskevicius:matrix.orgGytis Ivaskeviciusbut then we have extensions, apps, fancy permission handling, etc05:11:19
@haugh:matrix.orghaughbut for better or worse, modern web development is defined by browser-specific testing05:11:22
@jkarlson:kapsi.fiEmil KarlsonI think at least about 20% of linux users hate what browsers have become05:11:41
@haugh:matrix.orghaughno argument there05:11:48
@haugh:matrix.orghaughi'm just saying The Unix Philosophy has value but not as a dogma05:12:11
@jkarlson:kapsi.fiEmil Karlsonlike it's nice to have access to the prorietary world, but it's sad that it's so complicated that you can have only 2 options05:12:22
@jkarlson:kapsi.fiEmil Karlsonlike you can have consistent set of keybindings, except you can't because browser and terminal have conflicting set of defaults05:13:15
@haugh:matrix.orghaugh
In reply to @jkarlson:kapsi.fi
transients for what?
I just mean "write transient and template units instead of generating a bunch of hard units", which is encouraged by a proprietary format because it's a slightly higher bar to leaning on your text-hacking tools. This is just my experience
05:13:26
@jkarlson:kapsi.fiEmil Karlsonbrowser keybindings are fixed and shell keybindings you would have to change for each and every system separately05:14:02
@haugh:matrix.orghaugh poettering has entered the chat 05:18:13
@jkarlson:kapsi.fiEmil Karlson?05:18:29
@haugh:matrix.orghaughservice-based web browser when05:18:47
@jkarlson:kapsi.fiEmil KarlsonI think any innovation with browsers that is not directed by mozilla or google is all but impossible05:19:28

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6