!FBuJyWXTGcGtHTPphC:nixos.org

Nix Rust

700 Members
Rust155 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
16 Jan 2026
@logn:zirco.devLogan DevineStill doesn't work, hm03:13:56
@accelbread:matrix.orgaccelbreadI've got my miri package definitions here if it helps: [https://github.com/accelbread/flakelight-rust/tree/master/packages](miri packages)05:43:42
@accelbread:matrix.orgaccelbread* I've got my miri package definitions here if it helps: https://github.com/accelbread/flakelight-rust/tree/master/packages05:43:54
@accelbread:matrix.orgaccelbreadHas anyone gotten build-std working with nixpkgs rustc?05:57:29
@logn:zirco.devLogan Devine thank ya, I'll try this out 15:47:28
17 Jan 2026
@mirrorwake:matrix.orgroxie joined the room.03:33:14
@mirrorwake:matrix.orgroxie set a profile picture.03:35:00
@mirrorwake:matrix.orgroxie changed their profile picture.03:37:35
@debtquity:matrix.orgdebtquity

are there any tricks for speeding up local build times for rust packages in nixpkgs?

...
┏━ Dependency Graph:
┃ ✔ stalwart-0.15.3 ⏱ 21m29s
┣━━━ Builds
┗━ ∑ ⏵ 0 │ ✔ 1 │ ⏸ 0 │ Finished at 22:18:53 after 21m38s

20 minutes is wild

06:04:49
@charles:computer.surgeryCharles ⚡️ try disabling runtime performance optimizations like codegen-units = 1 and lto = true https://github.com/stalwartlabs/stalwart/blob/22fc4a795d56264aefd082040c6998c9371b83aa/Cargo.toml#L46-L47 06:21:37
@charles:computer.surgeryCharles ⚡️not sure if that fits your "local" criteria though06:22:30
@debtquity:matrix.orgdebtquityoh, i was hoping to do it from the building side without modifying the project06:22:44
@charles:computer.surgeryCharles ⚡️i don't know any such tricks unfortunately (but maybe someone else might?)06:23:11
@charles:computer.surgeryCharles ⚡️ i mean, you could add patches to the derivation to make those changes via overrideAttrs, unless you really mean "without changing any nix code or upstream code" 06:25:20
@debtquity:matrix.orgdebtquityah, i'll give that a shot. what do we lose with LTO, though?06:26:09
@charles:computer.surgeryCharles ⚡️https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/reference/profiles.html#lto06:26:46
@charles:computer.surgeryCharles ⚡️summary to the point of being unhelpful: you lose some performance06:27:20
@marienz:matrix.orgMarien ZwartShould be about the same performance as a non-incremental release build, if it's way slower than that you may be building at cores = 1 or something along those lines06:28:07
@debtquity:matrix.orgdebtquitymakes sense, so then whatever I write in overrideAttrs shouldn't be pushed to nixpkgs :)06:28:13
@charles:computer.surgeryCharles ⚡️yeah06:28:31
@charles:computer.surgeryCharles ⚡️for in-nixpkgs stuff the runtime performance increase is possibly worth the build time increase since it can then be pulled by multiple users from the binary cache without having to build it themselves06:30:40
@debtquity:matrix.orgdebtquity another thing i notice is that everytime i run nix build ./#package, it re-compiles all of the project. I thought rust had some build cache mechanism? 06:33:36
@charles:computer.surgeryCharles ⚡️rust does, nix doesn't06:33:51
@debtquity:matrix.orgdebtquityor maybe that's just the nature of nix?06:33:57
@debtquity:matrix.orgdebtquityooh06:33:59
@charles:computer.surgeryCharles ⚡️* rust (cargo, more accurately) does, nix doesn't06:34:00
@debtquity:matrix.orgdebtquityso nixpkgs function would need to be improved then06:34:29
@charles:computer.surgeryCharles ⚡️nix can't do incremental builds, it can only build complete derivations06:34:38
@charles:computer.surgeryCharles ⚡️you can sort of get incremental builds with nix by breaking up the build into multiple derivations, but that gets complicated06:35:03
@charles:computer.surgeryCharles ⚡️https://crane.dev kind of does this by splitting the nix builds into two derivations, one for all dependencies, and one for the final binary crate, which helps in some cases but not all, and can't be used in nixpkgs06:35:50

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6