| 1 Aug 2025 |
 emily | do you have a link to that though | 12:54:31 |
| emily | I remember seeing some good-looking kernel PR you did that got amjoseph'd | 12:54:44 |
| emily | maybe same one | 12:54:48 |
|  @brisingr05:matrix.org joined the room. | 18:05:44 |
| 2 Aug 2025 |
|  @saiko:knifepoint.net changed their profile picture. | 00:27:55 |
 @aloisw:julia0815.de | Are lines like this https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/59dd2e527d4ccc18fd9f8f773ccd0f2b4f43b980/pkgs/by-name/li/libimagequant/package.nix#L40 correct or should it be from buildPackages? | 09:14:21 |
| @aloisw:julia0815.de | I noticed that libimagequant != pkgsStatic.buildPackages.libimagequant, but am not sure if this is intentional. | 09:14:53 |
| emily | assume Rust cross / setEnv stuff is screwy by default | 09:25:35 |
| emily | has never steered me wrong | 09:25:45 |
| @aloisw:julia0815.de | Screwy in what way though, is the question here. FWIW putting buildPackages restores equality but I'm not sure if this is correct here. | 09:28:26 |
| emily | I believe it is because the corresponding use in the normal hooks will be one level up | 09:28:57 |
| @aloisw:julia0815.de | Thank you for validating my conjecture then, I will prepare a treewide fix then. | 09:32:47 |
| emily | a hook may be in order if you have the energy | 09:34:32 |
| @aloisw:julia0815.de | Not sure if that's worth it for the 6 packages that do it? | 09:39:42 |
| emily | 6 opportunities to mess up cross! | 09:46:27 |
