| 14 May 2025 |
 @aloisw:julia0815.de | Bumping your nixpkgs version is not a solution I guess? | 17:17:52 |
 @curid:matrix.org | Using old version for old glibc | 17:18:41 |
| @aloisw:julia0815.de | Why do you need old glibc? | 17:19:21 |
| @curid:matrix.org | To produce portable binaries | 17:20:50 |
| @aloisw:julia0815.de | The binaries are any more or less portable when you do that, since they still rely on the glibc being in the /nix/store. If you want to build portable binaries using Nix the best choice is probably static builds with musl. | 17:21:52 |
| @curid:matrix.org | hehe patchelf --set-interpreter "/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2" "$file" | 17:22:40 |
| @curid:matrix.org | I admit that it's rather cursed, but it has worked so far | 17:23:41 |
 Alyssa Ross | Is pkgsStatic not an option? | 17:23:52 |
| @curid:matrix.org | binary uses runtime linking | 17:24:27 |
