| 16 Nov 2024 |
 loudgolem | Redacted or Malformed Event | 05:11:49 |
| loudgolem | wait nvm https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/349360#issuecomment-2472038810 | 05:12:13 |
 Toma | Still have https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/356415, but fetchCargoVendor should be good to go after that. | 09:42:06 |
|  nyanbinary 🏳️⚧️ removed their profile picture. | 17:06:04 |
| nyanbinary 🏳️⚧️ set a profile picture. | 17:37:20 |
|  Viorel-Cătălin Răpițeanu changed their display name from @catalin:one.ems.host to Viorel-Cătălin Răpițeanu. | 18:23:08 |
| 17 Nov 2024 |
|  @orzklv:matrix.org joined the room. | 02:27:49 |
|  Matthias Meschede joined the room. | 15:24:46 |
|  Morj joined the room. | 17:39:25 |
| 18 Nov 2024 |
|  aktaboot changed their profile picture. | 08:03:11 |
 Gaétan Lepage | The new fetchCargoVendor fetcher is great !
I am currently bringing the support for it in nixpkgs-update.
However, I realized that <package>.cargoDeps has no outputHash attribute. I am not sure whether it was not included in purpose. | 12:32:27 |
 WeetHet | It also helps greatly with sandboxed builds on macOS, thanks to reducing the number of store paths | 12:46:22 |
| Gaétan Lepage | Toma have I missed something ? | 12:51:32 |
| Toma | In reply to @glepage:matrix.org
The new fetchCargoVendor fetcher is great !
I am currently bringing the support for it in nixpkgs-update.
However, I realized that <package>.cargoDeps has no outputHash attribute. I am not sure whether it was not included in purpose. The actual fod is cargoDeps.vendorStaging | 12:56:09 |
| Gaétan Lepage | Ok thanks ! | 12:57:01 |
|  pfhuh joined the room. | 15:08:45 |
|  undltd joined the room. | 16:10:09 |
| undltd | I'm getting a different binary size with nix develop + cargo build --release vs nix build:
$ LANG=C ls -l target/release/om result/bin/om
-r-xr-xr-x 1 root root 3498576 Jan 1 1970 result/bin/om
-rwxr-xr-x 2 me users 3013152 Nov 18 16:25 target/release/om
The package in question is https://codeberg.org/undltd/om/
What could be the reason? | 16:15:57 |
 emily | fixupPhase doing strip or something maybe | 16:18:22 |
| undltd | In reply to@emilazy:matrix.org
fixupPhase doing strip or something maybe I have strip enabled in Cargo.toml, and the nix build version is bigger instead of the other way around. Is there a way I could see a full log of what commands are run during nix build? | 16:19:34 |
| emily | set e.g. env.NIX_DEBUG = 7; for maximum verbosity | 16:19:56 |
| emily | (tune value to taste) | 16:19:58 |
| 19 Nov 2024 |
 Austin Horstman | In reply to @glepage:matrix.org
The new fetchCargoVendor fetcher is great !
I am currently bringing the support for it in nixpkgs-update.
However, I realized that <package>.cargoDeps has no outputHash attribute. I am not sure whether it was not included in purpose. I'm reviewing a package that is implementing that fetcher and seeing weird results... https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/356353 | 03:21:55 |
| Austin Horstman | author sees one vendor hash and I see another | 03:22:04 |
 ghpzin | In reply to@khaneliman:matrix.org
I'm reviewing a package that is implementing that fetcher and seeing weird results... https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/356353 Maybe one of the dependencies had submodules inside and your run had this included:
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/356415
but previous nixpkgs-review they had ~3 days ago did not have it, so it succeeded with previous hash. | 04:52:35 |
| ghpzin | Maybe one of the dependencies had submodules inside and your run had this included:
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/356415
but previous nixpkgs-review they run ~3 days ago did not have it, so it succeeded with previous hash. | 04:53:06 |
| Austin Horstman | In reply to @9hp71n:matrix.org
Maybe one of the dependencies had submodules inside and your run had this included:
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/356415
but previous nixpkgs-review they run ~3 days ago did not have it, so it succeeded with previous hash. That makes sense, thank you! | 04:53:24 |
|  crop joined the room. | 05:00:13 |
| crop | i use rust without rustup on nixos. (i just have cargo, rustc etc... in my shell.nix ) Is there a way to have miri in that case? | 05:02:24 |
| ghpzin | Iirc it is only included in nightly toolchains even in rustup, so you need either of the 2 overlays with nightly:
https://github.com/nix-community/fenix
https://github.com/oxalica/rust-overlay | 05:15:19 |
