| 26 Jun 2025 |
|  blaxxmith joined the room. | 09:10:12 |
| 27 Jun 2025 |
|  R̴̨͕͇͍̞̮̐̅͆̌̀̉̐͋̈́̃̀͒́̎̅̚̚̚͠͝Ĕ̵̡̛͖͖̟̙̫̱͈̘̞̭͍͍͑̌̄͑̓̋̓̀̈̏̈́͊̇͊͆̉͂̏̀̃̚͘͝͝ͅͅD̶̡̢͔̱̖̮͙͉̘̺͓͍̩̮͈͍͗̃̀̏͌͘͜ͅŚ̸̬̭̯̬͙͇͓̬̩̳̤͚͓̤̩̺͉͖̉͛̓̿̎͊̿̆́̐͂̇͌̄̇̓͘ͅͅT̴̞̫̘̝͇͔̟̪̪̦͂̔̎̀̎ͅŎ̷̡̬̹̪͈̭̣͈̭̭͉̦̖̝̘̪͖͔̥̦̘̻̳Ṋ̶̛̫͈̳̘͚̜̔̋͆̅̈́͊̑͊̉̌̈́̾͑̈́̚ͅË̸̡̨̨̛͇̜̖͔͖̻̟̗̠̙͓̘̗̥͉͇̜͑͆͊͑͑̀̓͒͜͝͝ changed their display name from Redstone to R̴̨͕͇͍̞̮̐̅͆̌̀̉̐͋̈́̃̀͒́̎̅̚̚̚͠͝Ĕ̵̡̛͖͖̟̙̫̱͈̘̞̭͍͍͑̌̄͑̓̋̓̀̈̏̈́͊̇͊͆̉͂̏̀̃̚͘͝͝ͅͅD̶̡̢͔̱̖̮͙͉̘̺͓͍̩̮͈͍͗̃̀̏͌͘͜ͅŚ̸̬̭̯̬͙͇͓̬̩̳̤͚͓̤̩̺͉͖̉͛̓̿̎͊̿̆́̐͂̇͌̄̇̓͘ͅͅT̴̞̫̘̝͇͔̟̪̪̦͂̔̎̀̎ͅŎ̷̡̬̹̪͈̭̣͈̭̭͉̦̖̝̘̪͖͔̥̦̘̻̳Ṋ̶̛̫͈̳̘͚̜̔̋͆̅̈́͊̑͊̉̌̈́̾͑̈́̚ͅË̸̡̨̨̛͇̜̖͔͖̻̟̗̠̙͓̘̗̥͉͇̜͑͆͊͑͑̀̓͒͜͝͝. | 00:54:17 |
| R̴̨͕͇͍̞̮̐̅͆̌̀̉̐͋̈́̃̀͒́̎̅̚̚̚͠͝Ĕ̵̡̛͖͖̟̙̫̱͈̘̞̭͍͍͑̌̄͑̓̋̓̀̈̏̈́͊̇͊͆̉͂̏̀̃̚͘͝͝ͅͅD̶̡̢͔̱̖̮͙͉̘̺͓͍̩̮͈͍͗̃̀̏͌͘͜ͅŚ̸̬̭̯̬͙͇͓̬̩̳̤͚͓̤̩̺͉͖̉͛̓̿̎͊̿̆́̐͂̇͌̄̇̓͘ͅͅT̴̞̫̘̝͇͔̟̪̪̦͂̔̎̀̎ͅŎ̷̡̬̹̪͈̭̣͈̭̭͉̦̖̝̘̪͖͔̥̦̘̻̳Ṋ̶̛̫͈̳̘͚̜̔̋͆̅̈́͊̑͊̉̌̈́̾͑̈́̚ͅË̸̡̨̨̛͇̜̖͔͖̻̟̗̠̙͓̘̗̥͉͇̜͑͆͊͑͑̀̓͒͜͝͝ changed their profile picture. | 00:55:39 |
|  @psibi:matrix.org left the room. | 09:38:19 |
|  nbp changed their display name from nbp to nbp — PTO. | 17:26:33 |
 emily | https://guix.gnu.org/en/blog/2025/a-new-rust-packaging-model/ it appears Guix has implemented almost exactly my Rust packaging proposal | 18:43:11 |
| emily | (coming from the other end of fully separate full fat Rust library packages though, rather than from the other end of opaque FOD summaries that we're at) | 18:44:41 |
 K900 | They're doing multiple versions of crates though? | 18:45:33 |
| K900 | I think | 18:45:35 |
| emily | that was also my proposal | 18:46:04 |
| emily | well, deduplicating where possible within one SemVer major - maybe they're not doing that part | 18:46:27 |
| K900 | Yeah I don't think they are | 18:46:44 |
| K900 | I'm mostly worried about the duplicating dependency resolution part | 18:46:57 |
| emily | cargo_metadata helps somewhat with that | 18:49:12 |
| emily | though not entirely | 18:49:17 |
| 28 Jun 2025 |
|  dramforever joined the room. | 07:32:05 |
| dramforever | we should probably do #399014 for rust. problem: how do we check for target is not x86(-32)? | 07:32:59 |
| dramforever | * we should probably do #399014 for rust. problem: how do we check for target is not x86-32? | 07:33:10 |
 Alyssa Ross | We have a rustc wrapper | 07:40:33 |
| Alyssa Ross | That I think is to some extent already target-aware | 07:40:58 |
| dramforever | so the problem afaiaw | 07:42:56 |
| dramforever | is that cargo really wants to use the same rustc for building build.rs and proc macros as the one for building for target | 07:43:17 |
| dramforever | so basically it's trying to use the same rustc as both (b, b, b) and (b, b, h) | 07:43:57 |
| Alyssa Ross | That's fine, isn't it? | 07:47:31 |
| Alyssa Ross | The wrapper can do different things depending on the target | 07:47:42 |
| dramforever | i don't think the wrapper as it is today knows about --target | 07:48:57 |
| dramforever | do we somehow add parsing for it? | 07:49:02 |
| Alyssa Ross | I thought it did | 08:00:43 |
