| 20 Aug 2024 |
 blitz | or do I have to manually patch it in one of the phases? | 14:50:51 |
 emily | should just be patches | 14:53:50 |
| emily | unless you are touching Cargo.lock stuff | 14:53:58 |
| blitz | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/doc/languages-frameworks/rust.section.md#vendoring-of-dependencies-vendoring-of-dependencies <- this looks like it could work. let me try... | 14:55:51 |
| blitz | emily
| 15:13:52 |
| blitz | * emily
| 15:13:59 |
| blitz | * emily
postPatch = ''
patch -d ../cargo-vendor-dir/somecrate-0.10.0 -p2 -i ${./some.patch}
'';
| 15:14:22 |
| blitz | this works | 15:14:28 |
| emily | you can probably just use patchFlags also | 15:15:14 |
| emily | but yeah, sure :) | 15:15:22 |
| emily | (why do you need to do this anyway?) | 15:15:27 |
| blitz | https://github.com/cloud-hypervisor/cloud-hypervisor/issues/6673 | 15:16:14 |
| blitz | before the fix is merged, it's easier to just patch the couple of lines that cause the issue in the dependent crate rather than the crate updates | 15:16:52 |
| emily | ah | 15:19:03 |
| 21 Aug 2024 |
|  Fraol Lemecha set a profile picture. | 20:24:14 |
| 22 Aug 2024 |
|  Jared Baur set a profile picture. | 02:07:14 |
|  Jack Leightcap joined the room. | 02:52:22 |
| Jack Leightcap | hey all -- i'm packaging a rust project, and noticed that nixpkgs doesn't include oxalica/rust-overlay: i'm curious then if there's a way to add targets to rustc inside nixpkgs, something like in a rust-toolchain.toml targets = [ "thumbv7em-none-eabihf" ] | 03:01:12 |
| Jack Leightcap | the context is an embedded firmware, so the target platform is fixed to arm-embedded. would pkgsCross.arm-embedded accomplish this? | 03:05:10 |
 ghpzin | Pretty sure this exact target is covered by something related to cross in rust section in nixpkgs. | 04:26:18 |
| ghpzin | * Jack Leightcap:
Pretty sure this exact target is covered by something related to cross in rust section in nixpkgs.
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/c79da508a6bea132f3a0debcec870063f99078f1/doc/languages-frameworks/rust.section.md#cross-compilation-cross-compilation | 04:27:01 |
| Jack Leightcap | thanks, RTFM needed and useful here | 04:38:57 |
| ghpzin | Does anybody know if there are workarounds for Cargo.lock having dependencies with same name, but different urls ?
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/183344 | 06:21:05 |
| ghpzin | * Does anybody know if there are workarounds for Cargo.lock having dependencies with same name, but different urls ?
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/183344
(other than editing Cargo.lock to use same one and hoping for the best) | 06:24:01 |
| ghpzin | * Does anybody know if there are workarounds for Cargo.lock having dependencies with same name, but different urls ?
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/30742
(other than editing Cargo.lock to use same one and hoping for the best) | 06:33:14 |
|  Artur Manuel joined the room. | 12:57:53 |
| Artur Manuel changed their profile picture. | 14:53:09 |
|  nyanbinary 🏳️⚧️ left the room. | 17:19:45 |
 Theo Paris | In reply to @9hp71n:matrix.org
Jack Leightcap:
Pretty sure this exact target is covered by something related to cross in rust section in nixpkgs.
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/c79da508a6bea132f3a0debcec870063f99078f1/doc/languages-frameworks/rust.section.md#cross-compilation-cross-compilation Is there a way to compile the rust std as a derivation in that case? It says the std isn't compiled when using the cross target... | 21:23:17 |
| Theo Paris | * Is there a way to compile the rust std as a derivation in that case? It says the std isn't compiled when using the cross target... Not sure whether or not the core/alloc crate applies here | 21:23:46 |
