| 15 Jul 2025 |
 emily | probably let's wait | 13:32:40 |
 Toma | alright | 13:33:05 |
| emily | probably not a big deal | 13:33:25 |
| emily | but means we can handle all the conflicts at once | 13:33:30 |
| emily | likely we'll need to deal with the staging branches too | 13:33:38 |
| emily | you have commit bit for that right? | 13:33:44 |
| Toma | I have not touched staging manually yet... | 13:35:50 |
| emily | it's pretty much just git merge, resolve conflicts, push | 13:36:52 |
| emily | but it is scary :P | 13:36:53 |
| emily | Toma: FWIW it seems nitpicking of useless useFetchCargoVendor = true; in PRs is a thing already | 15:34:36 |
| emily | so I definitely think we should warn or throw for a version so that CI can handle that | 15:34:45 |
| emily | (both work since warnings are forbidden in Nixpkgs) | 15:34:54 |
|  nyanbinary 🏳️⚧️ removed their profile picture. | 22:12:12 |
|  ginkogruen joined the room. | 22:52:22 |
| 16 Jul 2025 |
|  cods joined the room. | 13:47:42 |
|  @poacher:unredacted.org joined the room. | 15:36:55 |
| 17 Jul 2025 |
| nyanbinary 🏳️⚧️ set a profile picture. | 01:27:34 |
|  @zeromute:matrix.org left the room. | 04:52:44 |
|  @c0d3h01:matrix.org left the room. | 10:04:06 |
| @poacher:unredacted.org left the room. | 15:03:50 |
|  @imadalin:matrix.org left the room. | 16:15:05 |
|  Tom joined the room. | 18:58:46 |
|  ribosomerocker joined the room. | 23:57:53 |
| 19 Jul 2025 |
| Toma | Is there any way (that is acceptable inside nixpkgs) to build a rust based project using only LLVM/clang?
I'm seeing that the rustc's setEnv is using gcc even if I try to provide a different stdenv for buildRustPackage. | 22:58:02 |
| Toma | * Is there any way (that is acceptable inside nixpkgs) to build a rust based project using only LLVM/clang? (on linux)
I'm seeing that the rustc's setEnv is using gcc even if I try to provide a different stdenv for buildRustPackage. | 22:58:16 |
 Tristan Ross | pkgsLLVM is a good way | 23:03:16 |
| emily | I think we bake that stuff in annoyingly early | 23:03:17 |
| emily | we tried to get rid of setEnv but had to put it back | 23:03:29 |
| emily | In reply to @rosscomputerguy:matrix.org
pkgsLLVM is a good way not for an individual package in Nixpkgs though? | 23:03:44 |
| Tristan Ross | In reply to @emilazy:matrix.org
not for an individual package in Nixpkgs though? True | 23:03:57 |
